before hearing in Illinois

2007Charles Condominium Ass'n, 141 Ill.App.3d 834 , 837-38, 96 Ill.Dec. 311 , 491 N.E.2d 125 (1986) (letter that was obtained during discovery, tendered to the trial court before the hearing on the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and relied on extensively by the plaintiff in her argument against the motion, without objection, was properly before the appellate court); see also Kambylis v. Ford Motor Co., 338 Ill.

2007Charles Condominium Ass'n, 141 Ill.App.3d 834 , 837-38, 96 Ill.Dec. 311 , 491 N.E.2d 125 (1986) (letter that was obtained during discovery, tendered to the trial court before the hearing on the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and relied on extensively by the plaintiff in her argument against the motion, without objection, was properly before the appellate court); see also Kambylis v. Ford Motor Co., 338 Ill.

1976In Georgeoff v. Spencer (1948), 400 Ill. 300, 302 , 79 N.E.2d 596 , our supreme court held that if the lack of proper parties is brought to the attention of the court, it should not proceed further until the omission has been corrected.

1976In Georgeoff v. Spencer (1948), 400 Ill. 300, 302 , 79 N.E.2d 596 , our supreme court held that if the lack of proper parties is brought to the attention of the court, it should not proceed further until the omission has been corrected.

1976(Hobbs v. Pinnell (1959), 17 Ill. 2d 535, 536 , 162 N.E.2d 361 .) Both by its verified answer and in a colloquy with the trial court before the hearing commenced, the absence of the partnership as a party was brought to the attention of the trial court.

1976(Hobbs v. Pinnell (1959), 17 Ill. 2d 535, 536 , 162 N.E.2d 361 .) Both by its verified answer and in a colloquy with the trial court before the hearing commenced, the absence of the partnership as a party was brought to the attention of the trial court.

1973(Accord, People v. Abel (4th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 210 , 291 N.E.2d 841 ; People v. Kinsley (5th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 326 , 293 N.E.2d 627 .) In the case before us the facts disclosed in the pre-sentencing report which was given to the trial court before the hearing in aggravation and mitigation were adequate enough to constitute a basis for the plea entered by the defendant.

1973(Accord, People v. Abel (4th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 210 , 291 N.E.2d 841 ; People v. Kinsley (5th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 326 , 293 N.E.2d 627 .) In the case before us the facts disclosed in the pre-sentencing report which was given to the trial court before the hearing in aggravation and mitigation were adequate enough to constitute a basis for the plea entered by the defendant.

1973(Accord, People v. Abel (4th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 210 , 291 N.E.2d 841 ; People v. Kinsley (5th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 326 , 293 N.E.2d 627 .) In the case before us the facts disclosed in the pre-sentencing report which was given to the trial court before the hearing in aggravation and mitigation were adequate enough to constitute a basis for the plea entered by the defendant.

1973(Accord, People v. Abel (4th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 210 , 291 N.E.2d 841 ; People v. Kinsley (5th Dist. 1973), 10 Ill.App.3d 326 , 293 N.E.2d 627 .) In the case before us the facts disclosed in the pre-sentencing report which was given to the trial court before the hearing in aggravation and mitigation were adequate enough to constitute a basis for the plea entered by the defendant.

1934In People v. Dale, 355 Ill. 330 , this court held that before error can be successfully urged on this point, it must appear from the record not only that the time was asked for but that a refusal to grant it in some way embarrassed or prejudiced the defendant in his rights.

1934In Wells v. State, 108 Ark. 312 , 157 S. W. 389 , Wells was indicted for an assault with intent to kill.

1934In Wells v. State, 108 Ark. 312 , 157 S. W. 389 , Wells was indicted for an assault with intent to kill.

1928(City of Alton v. Heidrick, 248 Ill. 76 .) Whether the hearing be had at a law term or a probate term of the county court, it is indispensable that the record show that the court before which the hearing was had was regularly convened and organized.