8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Waymangreen2 sentences2020See People v. Wayman, 379 Ill. 2020See People v. Wayman, 379 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Kujbida v. Horizon Insurance Agency, Inc.green2 sentences2003See Kujbida, 260 Ill. 2003See Kujbida, 260 Ill.App.3d at 1008-09 , 198 Ill.Dec. 92 , 632 N.E.2d at 156 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Perruquetgreen1 sentence1980See Perruquet, 68 Ill. 2d 149, 154 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Sundell
green
2 sentences2025Defendant argued further that, even if the State were correct that defendant could waive his speedy- trial right for the fentanyl charge by failing to appear, defendant did not fail to appear at any time during the 160-day period following his speedy-trial demand. ¶ 39 On August 15, 2024, following arguments, the trial court ruled, without further elaboration, as follows: “[A]fter reviewing all of the case law and hearing the arguments, I am going to deny the State’s motion to reconsider.” -8- 2025 IL App (2d) 240490 ¶ 40 On August 21, 2024, the State filed a certificate of impairment and a no 2025Defendant argued further that, even if the State were correct that defendant could waive his speedy- trial right for the fentanyl charge by failing to appear, defendant did not fail to appear at any time during the 160-day period following his speedy-trial demand. ¶ 39 On August 15, 2024, following arguments, the trial court ruled, without further elaboration, as follows: “[A]fter reviewing all of the case law and hearing the arguments, I am going to deny the State’s motion to reconsider.” -8- 2025 IL App (2d) 240490 ¶ 40 On August 21, 2024, the State filed a certificate of impairment and a no | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Benford v. Chicago Transit Authority
green
1 sentence1979E.g., Benford v. Chicago Transit Authority (1973), 9 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.