Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Evansgreen2 sentences2001In that consolidated case, the court decided that the rule announced in People v. Evans, 174 Ill. 2d 320, 332 , 673 N.E.2d 244, 250 (1996), applied to negotiated guilty pleas in which the State agreed to a cap on its sentencing recommendation. 2001In that consolidated case, the court decided that the rule announced in People v. Evans, 174 Ill. 2d 320, 332 , 673 N.E.2d 244, 250 (1996), applied to negotiated guilty pleas in which the State agreed to a cap on its sentencing recommendation. | 3 | 3 |
Van Dyke v. Whitegreen1 sentence2022The court’s interpretation violated the principle of statutory construction that “[n]o part of a statute should be rendered meaningless or superfluous.” Van Dyke v. White, 2019 IL 121452, ¶ 46 (citing Skaperdas v. Country Casualty Insurance Co., 2015 IL 117021, ¶ 15 ). | 1 | 1 |
Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2011Finally, Trice claims that LVNV’s failure to register makes the judgment in its favor void, and not merely voidable. ¶ 11 When the trial court enters a void judgment, a party aggrieved by the judgment may attack it in a section 2–1401 motion without showing diligence. “[T]he allegation that the judgment or order is void substitutes for and negates the need to allege a meritorious defense and due diligence.” Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Education, 201 Ill. 2d 95, 104 (2002). ¶ 12 The parties cite us no case in which a court decided whether a violation of the Act rendered a judgment void. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Skaperdas v. Country Casualty Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2022The court’s interpretation violated the principle of statutory construction that “[n]o part of a statute should be rendered meaningless or superfluous.” Van Dyke v. White, 2019 IL 121452, ¶ 46 (citing Skaperdas v. Country Casualty Insurance Co., 2015 IL 117021, ¶ 15 ). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Glasper
green
1 sentence2015The court decided that the error was not “so serious that the second prong of the plain-error test is satisfied.” Glapser, 234 Ill. 2d at 215 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Vanderlei v. Heideman
green
1 sentence1985App. 3d 158 , 403 N.E.2d 756 , however, the court decided the defense of assumption of the risk could be applied under section 16. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
United States Steel Corp. v. Pollution Control Board
neutral
1 sentence1983The court concluded that as the petitioners had not argued in their initial briefs that the rules were arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable, they had “waived, and thereby failed to establish, the point that the regulations they challenge are arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable.” ( 64 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.