Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sulser v. Country Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences2016The court in Sulser additionally observed that underinsured-motorist coverage was “designed to offer insurance to ‘fill the gap’ between the claim and the tortfeasor’s insurance” and, as such, it “was obviously not intended to allow the insured to recover amounts from the insurer over and above the coverage provided by the underinsured motorist policy.” Sulser, 147 Ill. 2d at 556 . ¶ 24 In Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Rosen, 242 Ill. 2d 48 (2011), the court discussed the relationship between all statutorily required insurance—liability, uninsured-motorist, and underinsured-motorist coverage. 2016The court in Sulser additionally observed that underinsured-motorist coverage was “designed to offer insurance to ‘fill the gap’ between the claim and the tortfeasor’s insurance” and, as such, it “was obviously not intended to allow the insured to recover amounts from the insurer over and above the coverage provided by the underinsured motorist policy.” Sulser, 147 Ill. 2d at 556 . ¶ 24 In Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Rosen, 242 Ill. 2d 48 (2011), the court discussed the relationship between all statutorily required insurance–liability, uninsured-motorist, and underinsured-motorist coverage. | 8 | 1992–2016 |
Phoenix Insurance v. Rosen
green
2 sentences2016The court in Sulser additionally observed that underinsured-motorist coverage was “designed to offer insurance to ‘fill the gap’ between the claim and the tortfeasor’s insurance” and, as such, it “was obviously not intended to allow the insured to recover amounts from the insurer over and above the coverage provided by the underinsured motorist policy.” Sulser, 147 Ill. 2d at 556 . ¶ 24 In Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Rosen, 242 Ill. 2d 48 (2011), the court discussed the relationship between all statutorily required insurance—liability, uninsured-motorist, and underinsured-motorist coverage. 2016The court in Sulser additionally observed that underinsured-motorist coverage was “designed to offer insurance to ‘fill the gap’ between the claim and the tortfeasor’s insurance” and, as such, it “was obviously not intended to allow the insured to recover amounts from the insurer over and above the coverage provided by the underinsured motorist policy.” Sulser, 147 Ill. 2d at 556 . ¶ 24 In Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Rosen, 242 Ill. 2d 48 (2011), the court discussed the relationship between all statutorily required insurance–liability, uninsured-motorist, and underinsured-motorist coverage. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.