Illinois pattern instruction (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Illinois pattern instruction in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Balestri v. Terminal Freight Cooperative Ass'ngreen
ill · 1979 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005See Balestri v. Terminal Freight Cooperative Ass’n, 76 Ill. 2d 451, 456 , 394 N.E.2d 391, 393 (1979).

2005See Balestri v. Terminal Freight Cooperative Ass’n, 76 Ill. 2d 451, 456 , 394 N.E.2d 391, 393 (1979).

22
Hendrix v. Stepanekgreen
illappct · 2002 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006Hendrix v. Stepanek, 331 Ill.App.3d 206, 215 , 264 Ill.Dec. 855 , 771 N.E.2d 559, 567 (2002).

2006Hendrix v. Stepanek, 331 Ill.

12
People v. Timothy H.green
illappct · 1998 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Timothy H., 301 Ill.

2002Timothy H., 301 Ill.App.3d at 1016 , 235 Ill.Dec. 370 , 704 N.E.2d at 948 ("`[I]t is essential that jurors receive a definition or description of the applicable burden of proof ") (quoting Rikard v. Dover Elevator Co., 126 Ill.App.3d 438, 441 , 81 Ill.Dec. 686 , 467 N.E.2d 386, 388 (1984)).

12
Naleway v. Agnichgreen
illappct · 2008 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014App. 3d at 121 -22 (citing Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicago, 168 Ill. 2d 83, 100 (1995)). ¶ 111 The court modified the Illinois pattern instruction on the definition of willful and wanton conduct to include the phrase “without legal justification.” Plaintiff’s proposed jury instruction defining “willful and wanton” read as follows: “When I use the expression ‘willful and wanton conduct,’ I mean a course of action which shows actual or deliberate intention to harm or which, if not intentional, shows an utter indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of others.” ¶ 112 The Ill

11
Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicagogreen
ill · 1995 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014App. 3d at 121 -22 (citing Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicago, 168 Ill. 2d 83, 100 (1995)). ¶ 111 The court modified the Illinois pattern instruction on the definition of willful and wanton conduct to include the phrase “without legal justification.” Plaintiff’s proposed jury instruction defining “willful and wanton” read as follows: “When I use the expression ‘willful and wanton conduct,’ I mean a course of action which shows actual or deliberate intention to harm or which, if not intentional, shows an utter indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of others.” ¶ 112 The Ill

11
Rikard v. Dover Elevator Co.green
illappct · 1984 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Timothy H., 301 Ill.App.3d at 1016 , 235 Ill.Dec. 370 , 704 N.E.2d at 948 ("`[I]t is essential that jurors receive a definition or description of the applicable burden of proof ") (quoting Rikard v. Dover Elevator Co., 126 Ill.App.3d 438, 441 , 81 Ill.Dec. 686 , 467 N.E.2d 386, 388 (1984)).

2002Timothy H., 301 Ill.App.3d at 1016 , 235 Ill.Dec. 370 , 704 N.E.2d at 948 ("`[I]t is essential that jurors receive a definition or description of the applicable burden of proof ") (quoting Rikard v. Dover Elevator Co., 126 Ill.App.3d 438, 441 , 81 Ill.Dec. 686 , 467 N.E.2d 386, 388 (1984)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Attaway green
illappct · 1976
1 sentence

1979App. 3d 837, 854-55 , 354 N.E.2d 448, 462-63 .) In the instant case, as in Attaway, the jury was given the Illinois pattern instruction on witness credibility and the State’s burden of proof (IPI Criminal No. 1.02; IPI Criminal No. 2.03) as well as IPI Criminal No. 14.02, which instructs on the elements of the crime of armed robbery.

11979–1979

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check