principal-agent relationship exception (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

principal-agent relationship exception in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Woods v. Colegreen
ill · 1998 · cited in 7 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2011–2023
2 sentences

2023Id. “ ‘Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, a principal may be held liable for the tortious actions of an agent which cause a plaintiff’s injury, even if the principal does not himself [or herself] engage in any conduct in relation to the plaintiff.’ ” Id. (quoting Woods v. Cole, 181 Ill. 2d 512, 517 (1998)). ¶ 26 A principal is vicariously liable for the conduct of its agent but not for the conduct of an independent contractor.

2017Woods v. Cole, 181 Ill. 2d 512, 517 (1998).

57

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Lawlor v. North American Corporation of Illinois green
ill · 2013
2 sentences

2024“The principal-agent relationship is an exception to this general rule.” Id.

2015Lawlor v. North American Corp. of Illinois, 2012 IL 112530, ¶ 42 . “ ‘Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, a principal may be held liable for the tortious actions of an agent which cause a plaintiff’s injury, even if the principal does not himself engage in any conduct in relation to the plaintiff.’ ” Id. (quoting Woods v. Cole, 181 Ill. 2d 512, 517 (1998)).

32015–2024
Sperl v. Henry green
ill · 2019
2 sentences

2024“Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an agent’s wrongful conduct may be imputed to the principal.” Sperl v. Henry, 2018 IL 123132, ¶ 27 , 124 N.E.3d 936 .

2024“Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an agent’s wrongful conduct may be imputed to the principal.” Sperl v. Henry, 2018 IL 123132, ¶ 27 , 124 N.E.3d 936 .

12024–2024
Grinyou v. 303 Taxi, LLC green
illappct · 2017
2 sentences

2023Id. “ ‘Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, a principal may be held liable for the tortious actions of an agent which cause a plaintiff’s injury, even if the principal does not himself [or herself] engage in any conduct in relation to the plaintiff.’ ” Id. (quoting Woods v. Cole, 181 Ill. 2d 512, 517 (1998)). ¶ 26 A principal is vicariously liable for the conduct of its agent but not for the conduct of an independent contractor.

2023Grinyov v. 303 Taxi, L.L.C., 2017 IL App (1st) 160193, ¶ 26 . -8- However, the principal-agent relationship provides an exception to the general rule.

12023–2023

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check