Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Profitgreen2 sentences2020Id.; Profit, 2012 IL App (1st) 101307, ¶ 19 . 2017See Profit, 2012 IL App (1st) 101307, ¶ 19 . | 2 | 3 |
People v. Landergreen1 sentence2022Id.; People v. Lander, 215 Ill. 2d 577, 584 (2005); see also People v. Wallace, 2016 IL App (1st) 142758, ¶ 28 (observing that when faced with a facially valid 651(c) certificate, the question is “whether the record positively rebuts the presumption of reasonableness.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Edwards
green
2 sentences2023Edwards, -6- 197 Ill. 2d at 258 , 757 N.E.2d at 453 . ¶ 14 The State asserts Edwards is distinguishable because the record positively rebuts a claim of prejudice and a required presumption of prejudice in such a case undermines the purpose of first-stage review. 2023Edwards, -6- 197 Ill. 2d at 258 , 757 N.E.2d at 453 . ¶ 14 The State asserts Edwards is distinguishable because the record positively rebuts a claim of prejudice and a required presumption of prejudice in such a case undermines the purpose of first-stage review. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Wallace
green
1 sentence2022To overcome this presumption raised by the Rule 651(c) certificate, defendant must show that “the record positively rebuts the presumption of reasonableness.” People v. Wallace, 2016 IL App (1st) 142758, ¶ 28 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.