Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Strike Zone, S.S.B.&B. Corp.
green
2 sentences2017If the deductible amount is included in the subrogated loss claim the insurance carrier shall pay the full pro rata deductible share to its insured out of the net recovery on the subrogated claim.” Id. 2017If the deductible amount is included in the subrogated loss claim the insurance carrier shall pay the full pro rata deductible share to its insured out of the net recovery on the subrogated claim.” Id. -6- 2017 IL App (2d) 160307 In other words, because State Farm recovered approximately 97% of what it sought—$8,525 on its $8,775 claim—Rodriguez will receive $243 as an immediate result of the judgment. ¶ 13 In fairness to the trial court, in court, Plough’s representative noted only “the Illinois Insurance Code” and failed to cite the specific section. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Orejel v. York Intern. Corp., Inc.
green
2 sentences2015Orejel, 287 Ill. 2015App. 3d 246, 250 (1993)), where “the court held that the insurance company was the actual party in interest because, based upon the record, the plaintiff no longer had any interest in the subrogated claim.” (Emphasis in original.) Orejel, 287 Ill. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Blatz v. City of Rock Falls
green
2 sentences1993App. 3d 732 , 434 N.E.2d 807 , for the proposition that when an insured subrogates all his rights and interest to his insurer, he retains no interest in the subrogated claim. 1993(See Blatz v. City of Rock Falls (1982), 105 Ill. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Plough
green
1 sentence2017If the deductible amount is included in the subrogated loss claim the insurance carrier shall pay the full pro rata deductible share to its insured out of the net recovery on the subrogated claim.” Id. -6- 2017 IL App (2d) 160307 In other words, because State Farm recovered approximately 97% of what it sought—$8,525 on its $8,775 claim—Rodriguez will receive $243 as an immediate result of the judgment. ¶ 13 In fairness to the trial court, in court, Plough’s representative noted only “the Illinois Insurance Code” and failed to cite the specific section. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Prudential Insurance v. Romanelli
green
1 sentence1997Romanelli, 243 Ill. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Chicago, St. Charles & Mississippi Railroad v. Larned
neutral
1 sentence1977Co. v. Larned, 26 Ill. 218 , defendant contends that prior to the decision of the appellate court in this case, the provision of the loan receipt that the subrogee would be reimbursed to the extent of any net recovery effected by the subrogor had been construed to mean that after the deduction of costs and attorney fees the subrogated claim would be paid in full from the net recovery. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.