defendant argues error in Kansas

8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Wardgreen kan · 2011 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 1 sentence 2011See State v. Ward, 292 Kan. at 562 (leaving open the question of what standard applies when errors are raised that do not implicate the federal Constitution).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Dawson green kan · 2019 1 sentence 2025State v. Dawson, 310 Kan. 112 , 116, 444 P.3d 914 (2019).	1	2025–2025
Chapman v. California red scotus · 1967 1 sentence 2011Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.’ ” State v. Richmond, 289 Kan. 419, 440 , 212 P.3d 165 (2009) (quoting State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 [2008]). *855 However, in Ward we recognized that when, as here, the defendant argues that an error implicates the defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution, the statutory harmless error analysis under K.S.A. 60-261 and the federal constitutional error test under Chapman are the sam	1	2011–2011
State v. Richmond green kan · 2009 2 sentences 2011Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.’ ” State v. Richmond, 289 Kan. 419, 440 , 212 P.3d 165 (2009) (quoting State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 [2008]). 855 However, in Ward we recognized that when, as here, the defendant argues that an error implicates the defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution, the statutory harmless error analysis under K.S.A. 60-261 and the federal constitutional error test under Chapman are the sam 2011Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.’ ” State v. Richmond, 289 Kan. 419, 440 , 212 P.3d 165 (2009) (quoting State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 [2008]). 855 However, in Ward we recognized that when, as here, the defendant argues that an error implicates the defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution, the statutory harmless error analysis under K.S.A. 60-261 and the federal constitutional error test under Chapman are the sam	1	2011–2011
State v. Bryant green kan · 2008 2 sentences 2011Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.’ ” State v. Richmond, 289 Kan. 419, 440 , 212 P.3d 165 (2009) (quoting State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 [2008]). 855 However, in Ward we recognized that when, as here, the defendant argues that an error implicates the defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution, the statutory harmless error analysis under K.S.A. 60-261 and the federal constitutional error test under Chapman are the sam 2011Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.’ ” State v. Richmond, 289 Kan. 419, 440 , 212 P.3d 165 (2009) (quoting State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 [2008]). 855 However, in Ward we recognized that when, as here, the defendant argues that an error implicates the defendant’s rights under the United States Constitution, the statutory harmless error analysis under K.S.A. 60-261 and the federal constitutional error test under Chapman are the sam	1	2011–2011
State v. Barksdale green kan · 1999 1 sentence 2008In Cromwell , we held that where separate but similar criminal charges are joined in a single trial, evidence material to each crime is admissible independent of K.S.A. 60-455. [Citation omitted.]” 266 Kan. at 510 .	1	2008–2008
Apprendi v. New Jersey green scotus · 2000 2 sentences 2005Finally, the defendant argues the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L. 2005Finally, the defendant argues the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L.	1	2005–2005
Francis v. Franklin green scotus · 1985 1 sentence 1993In support thereof, he cites Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 , 85 L.	1	1993–1993
State v. Woods green kan · 1974 2 sentences 1984Under State v. Woods, 214 Kan. 739 , 522 P.2d 967 (1974), and State v. Greenlee, 228 Kan. 712, 722 , 620 P.2d 1132 (1980), our Supreme Court has held that possession of marijuana is not a lesser included offense of the sale of marijuana. 1984Under State v. Woods, 214 Kan. 739 , 522 P.2d 967 (1974), and State v. Greenlee, 228 Kan. 712, 722 , 620 P.2d 1132 (1980), our Supreme Court has held that possession of marijuana is not a lesser included offense of the sale of marijuana.	1	1984–1984
State v. Greenlee green kan · 1980 2 sentences 1984Under State v. Woods, 214 Kan. 739 , 522 P.2d 967 (1974), and State v. Greenlee, 228 Kan. 712, 722 , 620 P.2d 1132 (1980), our Supreme Court has held that possession of marijuana is not a lesser included offense of the sale of marijuana. 1984Under State v. Woods, 214 Kan. 739 , 522 P.2d 967 (1974), and State v. Greenlee, 228 Kan. 712, 722 , 620 P.2d 1132 (1980), our Supreme Court has held that possession of marijuana is not a lesser included offense of the sale of marijuana.	1	1984–1984
Malloy v. Hogan green scotus · 1964 2 sentences 1969The defendant argues that the privilege against self-incrimination as contained in the Fifth Admendment to the Constitution of the United States (Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U. S. 1 , 12 L. 1969Ed. 2d. 653, 659, 84 S. Ct. 1489 ), that “[n]o person shall be . . . compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself . . .”, protects an accused from being compelled to incriminate himself in any manner.	1	1969–1969
Ayaroa v. Benítez neutral · 1908 1 sentence 1929In Bentley v. Brown, 37 Kan. 14 , 14 Pac. 434 , this court said: “A court or jury trying the question of the value of legal services is not bound to accept as conclusive the opinions given by attorneys respecting such value.	1	1929–1929
Bentley, Hatfield & Bentley v. Brown neutral kan · 1887 1 sentence 1929In Bentley v. Brown, 37 Kan. 14 , 14 Pac. 434 , this court said: “A court or jury trying the question of the value of legal services is not bound to accept as conclusive the opinions given by attorneys respecting such value.	1	1929–1929

Where else courts name it

CT 71 (1979–2022) MA 55 (1957–2026) IL 38 (1967–2026) TN 19 (1992–2025) NH 16 (1980–2022) NY 14 (1966–2020) LA 13 (1985–2024) RI 8 (1972–2017) KS 8 (1929–2025) FL 6 (1999–2018) MO 6 (1936–1999) WV 5 (1987–1996) CO 4 (1970–2026) IN 4 (1982–2002) GA 4 (1979–1993) NC 4 (1984–1990) WA 4 (1962–1985) MI 4 (1968–2019) CA 3 (1958–1992) OK 3 (1929–1978) NE 3 (1932–1977) WI 3 (1974–2003) AL 2 (1978–1982) AZ 2 (1993–1995) DE 2 (1985–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check