Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Plummergreen2 sentences2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe 2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe | 1 | 5 |
State v. Cookgreen2 sentences2015See 286 Kan. at 1107 . 2015See 286 Kan. at 1107 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coxgreen2 sentences2013See State v. Cox, 297 Kan. 648, 662 , 304 P.3d 327 (2013) (applied to requested instruction on character evidence); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 301-02 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (applied to instructions on standard of care and professional judgment in medical malpractice action). 2013See State v. Cox, 297 Kan. 648, 662 , 304 P.3d 327 (2013) (applied to requested instruction on character evidence); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 301-02 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (applied to instructions on standard of care and professional judgment in medical malpractice action). | 1 | 1 |
Plummer Development, Inc. v. Prairie State Bankgreen2 sentences1993See Plummer, 248 Kan. at 666-67 . 1993See Plummer, 248 Kan. at 666-67 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ward
green
2 sentences2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe 2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe | 4 | 2022–2026 |
State v. Broxton
green
2 sentences2022State v. Broxton, 311 Kan. 357 , 361, 461 P.3d 54 (2020). 2022State v. Broxton, 311 Kan. 357 , 361, 461 P.3d 54 (2020). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Milo
green
2 sentences2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe 2026Kelly next argues the district court erred by denying his request for affirmative defense instructions. 16 For instruction issues, the starting point is our familiar four-part Plummer test: "(1) First, the appellate court should consider the reviewability of the issue from both jurisdiction and preservation viewpoints, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) next, the court should use an unlimited review to determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) then, the court should determine whether there was sufficient evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defe | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Foster ex rel. Foster v. Klaumann
green
2 sentences2013See State v. Cox, 297 Kan. 648, 662 , 304 P.3d 327 (2013) (applied to requested instruction on character evidence); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 301-02 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (applied to instructions on standard of care and professional judgment in medical malpractice action). 2013See State v. Cox, 297 Kan. 648, 662 , 304 P.3d 327 (2013) (applied to requested instruction on character evidence); Foster v. Klaumann, 296 Kan. 295, 301-02 , 294 P.3d 223 (2013) (applied to instructions on standard of care and professional judgment in medical malpractice action). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp.
green
2 sentences1993Annot. 110) rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.” The Plummer rule is based upon our analysis in Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp., 241 Kan. 595, 604 , 738 P.2d 1246 (1987). 1993Annot. 110) rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.” The Plummer rule is based upon our analysis in Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp., 241 Kan. 595, 604 , 738 P.2d 1246 (1987). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.