8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harknessgreen2 sentences2015See Harkness, 252 Kan. at 516 (attacking court reporter, showing confusion and difficulty making decisions, and twiddling thumbs not necessarily signs of incompetency because there were other plausible explanations for defendant’s actions). 2015See Harkness, 252 Kan. at 516 (attacking court reporter, showing confusion and difficulty making decisions, and twiddling thumbs not necessarily signs of incompetency because there were other plausible explanations for defendant's actions). | 2 | 2 |
Ross-Williams v. Bennettgreen1 sentence2026See Ross-Williams, 55 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
Florez v. Ginsberggreen1 sentence2026See Florez, 57 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Overmangreen2 sentences2022See State v. Overman, 301 Kan. 704, 712 , 348 P.3d 516 (2015) (finding that the district court's decision will be upheld if it is correct for any reason). 2022See State v. Overman, 301 Kan. 704, 712 , 348 P.3d 516 (2015) (finding that the district court's decision will be upheld if it is correct for any reason). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Michael J. Petergreen1 sentence2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Woods v. State
green
2 sentences2022The court found that Woods' motion was both untimely and successive. 52 Kan. 2021This court also addressed the effect of Woods' claim of actual innocence: 4 "[W]hat makes this case different from most K.S.A. 60-1507 cases is that we are faced with a guilty plea—and, more pressingly, one that has already withstood a challenge by way of a motion to withdraw a plea and a challenge under K.S.A. 60-1507 for ineffective assistance of counsel." 52 Kan. | 3 | 2020–2022 |
State v. Simmons
green
2 sentences2015Woods simply states: “The defense needed to ensure that the jury would be fair and unbiased . ... towards a person with mental illness.” But this misses the relevance question since Woods was not presenting a defense that he suffered from mental disease or defect. *871 No Kansas case is directly on point, although State v. Simmons, 292 Kan. 406 , 254 P.3d 97 (2011), provides support for concluding the district court properly limited Woods’ inquiry. 2015Woods simply states: “The defense needed to ensure that the jury would be fair and unbiased . ... towards a person with mental illness.” But this misses the relevance question since Woods was not presenting a defense that he suffered from mental disease or defect. *871 No Kansas case is directly on point, although State v. Simmons, 292 Kan. 406 , 254 P.3d 97 (2011), provides support for concluding the district court properly limited Woods’ inquiry. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Lofton
green
2 sentences2022State v. Lofton, 272 Kan. 216, 217 , 32 P.3d 711 (2001). 2022State v. Lofton, 272 Kan. 216, 217 , 32 P.3d 711 (2001). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences2022State v. Mitchell, 315 Kan. 156, 158 , 505 P.3d 739 (2022). 3 The district court properly denied Woods' motion to correct illegal sentence in 97CR1963 for two reasons. 2022State v. Mitchell, 315 Kan. 156, 158 , 505 P.3d 739 (2022). 3 The district court properly denied Woods' motion to correct illegal sentence in 97CR1963 for two reasons. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Thuko v. State
green
1 sentence2021Thuko v. State, 310 Kan. 74 , 80-81, 444 P.3d 927 (2019). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Fitzgerald
green
1 sentence2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Dunn
green
2 sentences2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. 2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Sales
green
2 sentences2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. 2020Next, Woods argues that under State v. Fitzgerald, 308 Kan. 659 , 423 P.3d 497 (2018); State v. Rodriguez, 305 Kan. 1139 , 390 P.3d 903 (2017); State v. Dunn, 304 Kan. 773 , 375 P.3d 332 (2016); State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, 135 , 224 P.3d 546 (2010); and United Sates v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 713-16 (11th Cir. 2002), he may raise at any time an argument that a complaint was statutorily insufficient and thus the district court lacked jurisdiction over him. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Woods
green
2 sentences2020With this understanding we move to consider the relevant factors under Woods, 301 Kan. at 867 . 21 A. The Woods factors 1. 2020With this understanding we move to consider the relevant factors under Woods, 301 Kan. at 867 . 21 A. The Woods factors 1. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.