Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Drane v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Drane, 867 N.E.2d at 146 (appellate court will not reweigh evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses). [14] Hyland also argues Officer Woods did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him, an argument we rejected in our analysis of the constitutionality of Officer Woods’ stop of Hyland’s vehicle. | 1 | 1 |
Person v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Person v. State, 764 N.E.2d 743, 748 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002), trans. denied. [8] Based on Gaddie, Hyland contends Officer Woods’ stop of his vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment 3 right under the United States Constitution to be free of unreasonable search and seizure because Officer Woods did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Hyland’s vehicle. | 1 | 1 |
Stewart v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Stewart, 768 N.E.2d at 15 435. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bright v. Kuehl
green
2 sentences2017According to the Estate, Woods’ claim fails due to a lack of evidence that Henry intended to compensate Woods. [23] “To recover under the theory of implied contract, the plaintiff is usually required to establish that the defendant impliedly or expressly requested the benefits conferred.” Bright, 650 N.E.2d at 315 . 2017“To recover under the theory of implied contract, the plaintiff is usually required to establish that the defendant impliedly or expressly requested the benefits conferred.” Bright, 650 N.E.2d at 315 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Pettiford v. State
green
1 sentence1991Pettiford, supra, at 326 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1987He challenged the conviction on the ground that he was not fully advised of his rights before entering his guilty plea Woods' guilty plea was entered prior to Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , and Boykin will not be applied retroactively. 1987He challenged the conviction on the ground that he was not fully advised of his rights before entering his guilty plea Woods' guilty plea was entered prior to Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , and Boykin will not be applied retroactively. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.