Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Larson v. Jessongreen2 sentences2018Appellate courts "review the judicial appeal panel's dismissal of the petition for discharge de novo." Foster v. Jesson , 857 N.W.2d 545 , 549 (Minn. App. 2014) (citation omitted); see Larson v. Jesson , 847 N.W.2d 531 , 534 (Minn. App. 2014) (same). 2015This burden is the burden of production, which is satisfied with “‘sufficient, competent evidence that, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief.’” Larson v. Jesson, 847 N.W.2d 531, 535 (Minn. App. 2014) (quoting Coker, 831 N.W.2d 4 at 486 ). | 2 | 2 |
Coker v. Jessongreen2 sentences2018When a panel assesses whether the committed person made a prima facie case, the panel "may not weigh the evidence or make credibility determinations," *67 and must "view the evidence produced at the first-phase hearing in a light most favorable to the committed person." Coker , 831 N.W.2d at 490 -91 . 2016When deciding 4 whether the petitioner has satisfied the burden of production, the panel must “view the evidence produced at the first-phase hearing in a light most favorable to the committed person.” Coker, 831 N.W.2d at 491 . | 1 | 7 |
Matter of Gonzalezgreen1 sentence2018See In re Gonzalez , 456 N.W.2d 724 , 728 (Minn. App. 1990) (noting, in an appeal from a commitment as mentally ill, that "the error [by the district court], if any, was harmless"); In re Picataci , 367 N.W.2d 609 , 613 (Minn. App. 1985) (making a similar statement). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Blodgettgreen1 sentence2013See Minn.Stat. § 253B.19, subd. 2(d); In re Blodgett 510 N.W.2d 910, 917 (Minn.1994) (noting that in “a proceeding where a committed person is seeking a discharge from commitment ... the burden of proof should be on the state to show by clear and convincing evidence that commitment should continue”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Picataci
neutral
1 sentence2018See In re Gonzalez , 456 N.W.2d 724 , 728 (Minn. App. 1990) (noting, in an appeal from a commitment as mentally ill, that "the error [by the district court], if any, was harmless"); In re Picataci , 367 N.W.2d 609 , 613 (Minn. App. 1985) (making a similar statement). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services
green
1 sentence2018Appellate courts "review the judicial appeal panel's dismissal of the petition for discharge de novo." Foster v. Jesson , 857 N.W.2d 545 , 549 (Minn. App. 2014) (citation omitted); see Larson v. Jesson , 847 N.W.2d 531 , 534 (Minn. App. 2014) (same). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.