Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Swallow v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Standard of Review "This Court's review of a denial of post-conviction relief is limited to a determination of clear error in the circuit court's findings of fact and conclusions of law." Swallow v. State, 398 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Mo. banc 2013). 2024Standard of Review “This Court’s review of a denial of post-conviction relief is limited to a determination of clear error in the circuit court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Swallow v. State, 398 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Mo. banc 2013). | 4 | 4 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Taylor v. State, 382 S.W.3d 78, 80 (Mo. banc 2012). 2016Taylor v. State, 382 S.W.3d 78, 80 (Mo. banc 2012). | 3 | 3 |
Straub v. Stategreen1 sentence2024“This standard of review, however, presupposes that the motion court carried out its obligation to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented, whether or not a hearing is held.” Straub v. State, 523 S.W.3d 602, 605 (Mo.App. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Goodwin v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Goodwin v. State, 191 S.W.3d 20, 25-26 (Mo. banc 2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.