Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Kramer v. Walkergreen2 sentences2015Kramer v. Walker, 926 S.W.2d 72, 74 (Mo.App.W.D. 1996) (hearing on PDL motion where evidence taken on issue of temporary custody did not make subsequent change of judge motion on underlying modification proceeding untimely; judge had no discretion but to grant timely request for change of judge filed after ruling on pre-trial PDL motion). 2015Kramer v. Walker, 926 S.W.2d 72, 74 (Mo. App. W.D. 1996) (hearing on PDL motion where evidence taken on issue of temporary custody did not make subsequent change of judge motion on underlying modification proceeding untimely; judge had no discretion but to grant timely request for change of judge filed after ruling on pre-trial PDL motion). | 2 | 2 |
In re the Marriage of Davisgreen2 sentences2002In support of the decision, the Western District stated that “[e]conomy fe served by a single trial disposing of all issues, so a party should not be penalized for his or her election to forego an additional hearing on [PDL] motions.” Id. 2002See In re Marriage of Davis, 821 S.W.2d 123, 123-24 (Mo.App. | 1 | 2 |
Cmd v. Jrdgreen2 sentences2002The only exception was C.M.D., where the PDL motion had been filed but not ruled on, and the court determined that the lack of action constituted a waiver of the wife’s claim to retroactive maintenance. 710 S.W.2d at 478-79 . 2002The PDL motion, however, was never heard, and the appellate court reversed the retroactive maintenance award, stating that “if [the] wife was dissatisfied with this amount [the amount voluntarily provided by the husband], her remedy was to seek a ruling on her motion PDL .... [and her] failure to do so waived any claim she may have had for increased allowances during this period.” Id. | 1 | 2 |
Dardick v. Dardickgreen1 sentence2021See Dardick v. Dardick, 661 S.W.2d 538, 540 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983) (“It is well established in Missouri that orders on motions to allow maintenance and suit costs pendente lite are judgments in independent proceedings.”) The trial court had broad discretion to divide marital debt and the division need not be equal. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2006See Johnson v. Johnson, 112 S.W.3d 460, 464-65 (Mo.App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
McKee v. McKeegreen2 sentences2002See Fuldner, 41 S.W.3d at 587, 598 ; McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 949-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; Tappan, 856 S.W.2d at 369-70 ; Kessler, 719 S.W.2d at 140 . 2002See McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 947-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; In re Marriage of Tappan, 856 S.W.2d 362, 363, 369-70 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Fuldnergreen2 sentences2002See Fuldner, 41 S.W.3d at 587, 598 ; McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 949-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; Tappan, 856 S.W.2d at 369-70 ; Kessler, 719 S.W.2d at 140 . 2002One final case of note in our review is Fuldner , which involved an appeal from a dissolution judgment where no PDL motion was filed seeking temporary maintenance. 41 S.W.3d at 586, 598 . | 1 | 1 |
Kessler v. Kesslergreen2 sentences2002See Fuldner, 41 S.W.3d at 587, 598 ; McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 949-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; Tappan, 856 S.W.2d at 369-70 ; Kessler, 719 S.W.2d at 140 . 2002See id. at 138-140 . | 1 | 1 |
Browning v. Browninggreen2 sentences2002See Browning, 947 S.W.2d at 111 ; Hunt, 933 S.W.2d at 447 ; Davis, 821 S.W.2d at 124 ; Roedel, 788 S.W.2d at 789, 791 . 2002See Browning, 947 S.W.2d at 107, 111 . | 1 | 1 |
Roedel v. Roedelgreen2 sentences2002The statutory basis for the wife’s PDL motion filed in Roedel was § 452.315, which the court determined was not bound by a prospective-only constraint, in that one purpose of making such support awards retroactive to the filing date of the PDL motion is to ensure that a spouse who needs temporary maintenance support during the pendency of a divorce proceeding is not “left utterly destitute” simply due to a delay in having the PDL motion heard. 788 S.W.2d at 791 . 2002See Roedel v. Roedel, 788 S.W.2d 788, 789 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Tappangreen2 sentences2002See Tappan, 856 S.W.2d at 370 ; see also C.M.D., 710 S.W.2d at 478 . 2002See McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 947-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; In re Marriage of Tappan, 856 S.W.2d 362, 363, 369-70 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Care & Treatment of Kirk v. State
green
2 sentences2024All three of Husband’s multifarious points relied on violate Rule 84.04(d) because they “group together multiple, independent claims rather than a single claim of error[.]” Macke v. Patton, 591 S.W.3d 865 , 869 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Kirk, 520 S.W.3d at 450 n.3). 2024All three of Husband’s multifarious points relied on violate Rule 84.04(d) because they “group together multiple, independent claims rather than a single claim of error[.]” Macke v. Patton, 591 S.W.3d 865 , 869 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Kirk, 520 S.W.3d at 450 n.3). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Loren Macke, Pamela Eden v. Austin Patton
green
2 sentences2024All three of Husband’s multifarious points relied on violate Rule 84.04(d) because they “group together multiple, independent claims rather than a single claim of error[.]” Macke v. Patton, 591 S.W.3d 865 , 869 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Kirk, 520 S.W.3d at 450 n.3). 2024All three of Husband’s multifarious points relied on violate Rule 84.04(d) because they “group together multiple, independent claims rather than a single claim of error[.]” Macke v. Patton, 591 S.W.3d 865 , 869 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Kirk, 520 S.W.3d at 450 n.3). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Ritter v. Ritter
green
2 sentences2002See Fuldner, 41 S.W.3d at 587, 598 ; McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 949-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; Tappan, 856 S.W.2d at 369-70 ; Kessler, 719 S.W.2d at 140 . 2002See McKee, 940 S.W.2d at 947-50 ; Ritter, 920 S.W.2d at 154-55 ; In re Marriage of Tappan, 856 S.W.2d 362, 363, 369-70 (Mo.App. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In Re the Marriage of Hunt
green
1 sentence2002See Browning, 947 S.W.2d at 111 ; Hunt, 933 S.W.2d at 447 ; Davis, 821 S.W.2d at 124 ; Roedel, 788 S.W.2d at 789, 791 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Sparks v. Sparks
green
1 sentence1990Id. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.