8 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Haynes v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Haynes v. State, 250 So. 3d 1241, 1244 (¶6) (Miss. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
Jabroski Lloyd v. State of Mississippigreen1 sentence2020Lloyd v. State, 228 So. 3d 953, 956 (¶10) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Bush v. Statered2 sentences2016In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we must decide whether it allows a jury to find “beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss. 2005). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond 2016In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we must decide whether it allows a jury to find “beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss. 2005). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond | 1 | 1 |
Conwill v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Conwill v. State, 168 So.3d 1080, 1084 (¶ 19) (Miss.Ct.App.2013). | 1 | 1 |
Byrd v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMgreen1 sentence2002See Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Dishmon, 797 So.2d 888, 890 (¶ 2) (Miss.2002) (a factually similar case reversed for the same Dr. Winkelmann's sitting on both the Board and Commission); Dean v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 797 So.2d 830, 836 (¶ 26) (Miss.2000); Byrd v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 774 So.2d 434, 440-41 (¶ 30-33) (Miss. 2000); Flowers v. Public Employees Retirement Sys., 748 So.2d 178, 180 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
Flowers v. PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYS.green1 sentence2002See Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Dishmon, 797 So.2d 888, 890 (¶ 2) (Miss.2002) (a factually similar case reversed for the same Dr. Winkelmann's sitting on both the Board and Commission); Dean v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 797 So.2d 830, 836 (¶ 26) (Miss.2000); Byrd v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 774 So.2d 434, 440-41 (¶ 30-33) (Miss. 2000); Flowers v. Public Employees Retirement Sys., 748 So.2d 178, 180 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
Dean v. Public Emp. Retirement Systemgreen1 sentence2002See Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Dishmon, 797 So.2d 888, 890 (¶ 2) (Miss.2002) (a factually similar case reversed for the same Dr. Winkelmann's sitting on both the Board and Commission); Dean v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 797 So.2d 830, 836 (¶ 26) (Miss.2000); Byrd v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 774 So.2d 434, 440-41 (¶ 30-33) (Miss. 2000); Flowers v. Public Employees Retirement Sys., 748 So.2d 178, 180 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Dishmongreen1 sentence2002See Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Dishmon, 797 So.2d 888, 890 (¶ 2) (Miss.2002) (a factually similar case reversed for the same Dr. Winkelmann's sitting on both the Board and Commission); Dean v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 797 So.2d 830, 836 (¶ 26) (Miss.2000); Byrd v. Public Employees' Retirement Sys., 774 So.2d 434, 440-41 (¶ 30-33) (Miss. 2000); Flowers v. Public Employees Retirement Sys., 748 So.2d 178, 180 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
Ivy v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.green1 sentence1992See Ivy v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., 510 So.2d 520 (Miss.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scoggins v. Ellzey Beverages, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006In Scoggins , where the plaintiff's argument of memory loss was put forward as a defense, comparable to Allen's defense of forgetfulness here, we agreed with the trial court's finding that the plaintiff witness was not credible because she could remember details of other aspects of her life and only had claimed a loss of memory concerning the medical history she failed to disclose. 743 So.2d at 995 . 2005In Scoggins, where the plaintiff’s argument of memory loss was put forward as a defense, comparable to Allen’s defense of forgetfulness here, we agreed with the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff witness was not credible because she could remember details of other aspects of her life and only had claimed a loss of memory concerning the medical history she failed to disclose. 743 So.2d at 995 . | 2 | 2005–2006 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2016In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we must decide whether it allows a jury to find “beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss. 2005). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond 2016In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we must decide whether it allows a jury to find “beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.” Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss. 2005). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Vinegar Bend Lumber Co. v. Oak Grove & Georgetown Railroad
neutral
1 sentence2006Citing Shurley v. State, 90 Miss. 415 , 43 So. 299 (Miss.1907), Allen argues that the trial court failed to enter an order reflecting the amendment; therefore, the amendment is void. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Shurley v. State
neutral
1 sentence2006Citing Shurley v. State, 90 Miss. 415 , 43 So. 299 (Miss.1907), Allen argues that the trial court failed to enter an order reflecting the amendment; therefore, the amendment is void. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.