Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Byrd v. Bowiegreen2 sentences2008Byrd v. Bowie, 933 So.2d 899, 901, 907 (¶¶ 1, 29) (Miss.2006). ¶ 3. 2008Byrd v. Bowie , 933 So.2d 899 , 901 , 907 (¶¶ 1, 29) (Miss. 2006). ¶ 3. | 1 | 1 |
Choctaw, Inc. v. Wichnergreen1 sentence1990The majority believe that because we have allowed tortfeasors to use the injured spouse's contributory negligence as a defense to the recovery of damages in a loss of consortium action, Choctaw, Inc. v. Wichner, 521 So.2d 878, 881 (Miss. 1988), that all defenses including assumption of the risk can be used as a defense to bar Byrd's claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Byrd v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM
green
2 sentences2005Sys., 774 So.2d 434 (Miss.2000), we affirmed the circuit court's finding that PERS properly denied Byrd's claim for permanent disability. [7] Id. at 436 . 2005Sys., 774 So.2d 434 (Miss.2000), we affirmed the circuit court's finding that PERS properly denied Byrd's claim for permanent disability. [7] Id. at 436 . | 4 | 2000–2005 |
Superior Car Rental, Inc. v. Roberts
green
2 sentences2007We granted certiorari to clarify our previous opinion in Superior Car Rental v. Roberts, 871 So.2d 1286 (Miss.2004), as to interpretation of the savings clause in the Civil Justice Reform Act. *907 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 4. 2006We granted certiorari to clarify our previous opinion in Superior Car Rental v. Roberts, 871 So. 2d 1286 (Miss. 2004), as to interpretation of the savings clause in the Civil Justice Reform Act. | 2 | 2006–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.