Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ricogreen2 sentences2021See State v. Rico, 218 N.C. App. 109, 122 , 720 S.E.2d 801, 809 (Steelman, J., dissenting), rev’d per curiam for reasons stated in dissent, 366 N.C. 327 , 734 S.E.2d 571 (2012). ¶ 18 In Rico, the defendant was charged with first-degree murder. 2021See State v. Rico, 218 N.C. App. 109, 122 , 720 S.E.2d 801, 809 (Steelman, J., dissenting), rev’d per curiam for reasons stated in dissent, 366 N.C. 327 , 734 S.E.2d 571 (2012). ¶ 18 In Rico, the defendant was charged with first-degree murder. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Ricogreen2 sentences2021See State v. Rico, 218 N.C. App. 109, 122 , 720 S.E.2d 801, 809 (Steelman, J., dissenting), rev’d per curiam for reasons stated in dissent, 366 N.C. 327 , 734 S.E.2d 571 (2012). ¶ 18 In Rico, the defendant was charged with first-degree murder. 2021See State v. Rico, 218 N.C. App. 109, 122 , 720 S.E.2d 801, 809 (Steelman, J., dissenting), rev’d per curiam for reasons stated in dissent, 366 N.C. 327 , 734 S.E.2d 571 (2012). ¶ 18 In Rico, the defendant was charged with first-degree murder. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hughesred2 sentences2005However, “[b]ecause ‘speculation] on what juries would have done if they had been asked to find different facts’ is impermissible,” the Court concluded in Allen that “ ‘[h] armless error analysis cannot be conducted on Blakely Sixth Amendment violations.’ ” 359 N.C. at 448 , 615 S.E.2d at 271 -72 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wash. 2d 118, 148 , 110 P.3d 192, 208 (2005)). 2005However, “[b]ecause ‘speculation] on what juries would have done if they had been asked to find different facts’ is impermissible,” the Court concluded in Allen that “ ‘[h] armless error analysis cannot be conducted on Blakely Sixth Amendment violations.’ ” 359 N.C. at 448 , 615 S.E.2d at 271 -72 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wash. 2d 118, 148 , 110 P.3d 192, 208 (2005)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Barrow
green
2 sentences2020While the trial court’s instruction was in error, Defendant must demonstrate “a reasonable possibility that had the instruction been given, the jury would have failed to find the existence of the aggravating factors.” Id. at 446 , 718 S.E.2d at 679 . 2020While the trial court’s instruction was in error, Defendant must demonstrate “a reasonable possibility that had the instruction been given, the jury would have failed to find the existence of the aggravating factors.” Id. at 446 , 718 S.E.2d at 679 . | 3 | 2017–2020 |
State v. Barrow
neutral
1 sentence2017App. 436 , 446, 718 S.E.2d 673 , 679 (2011) (citations and quotation marks omitted), aff'd , 366 N.C. 141 , 72 S.E.2d 546 (2012). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Blakely v. Washington
green
2 sentences2006Accordingly, defendant’s sentence violates Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 159 L. 2006Accordingly, defendant’s sentence violates Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 159 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Allen
green
2 sentences2005However, “[b]ecause ‘speculation] on what juries would have done if they had been asked to find different facts’ is impermissible,” the Court concluded in Allen that “ ‘[h] armless error analysis cannot be conducted on Blakely Sixth Amendment violations.’ ” 359 N.C. at 448 , 615 S.E.2d at 271 -72 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wash. 2d 118, 148 , 110 P.3d 192, 208 (2005)). 2005However, “[b]ecause ‘speculation] on what juries would have done if they had been asked to find different facts’ is impermissible,” the Court concluded in Allen that “ ‘[h] armless error analysis cannot be conducted on Blakely Sixth Amendment violations.’ ” 359 N.C. at 448 , 615 S.E.2d at 271 -72 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wash. 2d 118, 148 , 110 P.3d 192, 208 (2005)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Brady v. United States
green
2 sentences2005Defendant’s stipulation to the aggravating factor that he was on pretrial release at the time the offense was committed was not a “knowing [and] intelligent act[] done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.” Brady, 397 U.S. at 748 , 25 L. 2005Defendant’s stipulation to the aggravating factor that he was on pretrial release at the time the offense was committed was not a “knowing [and] intelligent act[] done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.” Brady, 397 U.S. at 748 , 25 L. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Benbow
green
2 sentences1985This contention overlooks our statement in State v. Benbow, 309 N.C. 538 , 308 S.E. 2d 647 (1983), in which we said that for purposes of sentencing, reliance on evidence from the trials of others connected with the same offense is improper absent a stipulation. 1985This contention overlooks our statement in State v. Benbow, 309 N.C. 538 , 308 S.E. 2d 647 (1983), in which we said that for purposes of sentencing, reliance on evidence from the trials of others connected with the same offense is improper absent a stipulation. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.