Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leandro v. Stategreen2 sentences2026Second, the Court of Appeals held that “the fundamental educational right under the . . . [c]onstitution is limited to one of equal access to education, and it does not embrace a qualitative standard.” Id. at 11, 468 S.E.2d at 550. 2022The Court of Appeals held that “the fundamental educational right under the North Carolina Constitution is limited to one of equal access to education, and it does not embrace a qualitative standard.” Id. at 11 (emphasis added). | 6 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Leandro v. State
green
2 sentences2022STATE 2022-NCSC-108 Opinion of the Court education; rather, “there is a qualitative standard inherent in the right to education guaranteed by this state’s constitution.” Id. at 346 . 2022It concluded that “the right to education guaranteed by the North Carolina Constitution is limited to one of equal access to the existing system of education and does not embrace a qualitative standard.” Id. at 344 , 488 S.E.2d at 253 (citing Leandro v. North Carolina, 122 N.C. | 3 | 2022–2022 |
Wilkes v. United States
green
1 sentence1999State v. Maynard, 311 N.C. 1, 27 , 316 S.E.2d 197, 212 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 963 , 83 L. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Cox v. Illinois
green
1 sentence1999State v. Maynard, 311 N.C. 1, 27 , 316 S.E.2d 197, 212 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 963 , 83 L. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Maynard
green
2 sentences1999State v. Maynard, 311 N.C. 1, 27 , 316 S.E.2d 197, 212 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 963 , 83 L. 1999State v. Maynard, 311 N.C. 1, 27 , 316 S.E.2d 197, 212 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 963 , 83 L. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Board of Education v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1997In Board of Educ. v. Board of Comm'rs of Granville County, 174 N.C. 469 , 93 S.E. 1001 (1917), for example, we stated: [I]t is manifest that these constitutional provisions were intended to establish a system of public education adequate to the needs of a great and progressive people, affording school facilities of recognized and ever-increasing merit to all the children of the State, and to the full extent that our means could afford and intelligent direction accomplish. 1997In Board of Educ. v. Board of Comm'rs of Granville County, 174 N.C. 469 , 93 S.E. 1001 (1917), for example, we stated: [I]t is manifest that these constitutional provisions were intended to establish a system of public education adequate to the needs of a great and progressive people, affording school facilities of recognized and ever-increasing merit to all the children of the State, and to the full extent that our means could afford and intelligent direction accomplish. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Sneed v. Greensboro City Board of Education
green
2 sentences1997It based its holding on a single sentence from this Court's opinion in Sneed v. Greensboro City Bd. of Educ., 299 N.C. 609 , 264 S.E.2d 106 (1980): "`It is clear, then, that equal access to participation in our public school system is a fundamental right, guaranteed by our state constitution and protected by considerations of procedural due process.'" Leandro, 122 N.C.App. at 11 , 468 S.E.2d at 550 (quoting Sneed, 299 N.C. at 618 , 264 S.E.2d at 113 ). 1997It based its holding on a single sentence from this Court's opinion in Sneed v. Greensboro City Bd. of Educ., 299 N.C. 609 , 264 S.E.2d 106 (1980): "`It is clear, then, that equal access to participation in our public school system is a fundamental right, guaranteed by our state constitution and protected by considerations of procedural due process.'" Leandro, 122 N.C.App. at 11 , 468 S.E.2d at 550 (quoting Sneed, 299 N.C. at 618 , 264 S.E.2d at 113 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Britt v. North Carolina State Board of Education
green
1 sentence1996As in Britt , plaintiff parties here “have not alleged that they are being denied an education . ...” Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.