Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1961–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gallimore v. STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC WORKS COM'Ngreen2 sentences2020N.C.G.S. § 136-112(1) (2019).3 See also, N.C. Highway Comm’n v. Hettiger, 271 N.C. 152, 156 , 155 S.E.2d 469, 472 (1967) (identifying that this statute prescribes the rule for determining what constitutes just compensation); Gallimore v. Highway Comm’n, 241 N.C. 350, 353 , 85 S.E.2d 392, 395 (1955) (holding that just compensation is the fair market value of the property before and after the taking of a portion for highway purposes). 2020N.C.G.S. § 136-112(1) (2019).3 See also, N.C. Highway Comm’n v. Hettiger, 271 N.C. 152, 156 , 155 S.E.2d 469, 472 (1967) (identifying that this statute prescribes the rule for determining what constitutes just compensation); Gallimore v. Highway Comm’n, 241 N.C. 350, 353 , 85 S.E.2d 392, 395 (1955) (holding that just compensation is the fair market value of the property before and after the taking of a portion for highway purposes). | 2 | 2 |
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. Hettigergreen2 sentences2020N.C.G.S. § 136-112(1) (2019).3 See also, N.C. Highway Comm’n v. Hettiger, 271 N.C. 152, 156 , 155 S.E.2d 469, 472 (1967) (identifying that this statute prescribes the rule for determining what constitutes just compensation); Gallimore v. Highway Comm’n, 241 N.C. 350, 353 , 85 S.E.2d 392, 395 (1955) (holding that just compensation is the fair market value of the property before and after the taking of a portion for highway purposes). 2020N.C.G.S. § 136-112(1) (2019).3 See also, N.C. Highway Comm’n v. Hettiger, 271 N.C. 152, 156 , 155 S.E.2d 469, 472 (1967) (identifying that this statute prescribes the rule for determining what constitutes just compensation); Gallimore v. Highway Comm’n, 241 N.C. 350, 353 , 85 S.E.2d 392, 395 (1955) (holding that just compensation is the fair market value of the property before and after the taking of a portion for highway purposes). | 2 | 2 |
Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. Hastygreen2 sentences1964The statute prescribes the standard, and the standard fixed by the Legislature is absolute.” Aldridge v. Hasty, 240 N.C. 353, 360 , 82 S.E. 2d 331 ; Strong, N. C. 1964The statute prescribes the standard, and the standard fixed by the Legislature is absolute.” Aldridge v. Hasty, 240 N.C. 353, 360 , 82 S.E. 2d 331 ; Strong, N. C. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bondurant v. Mastin
green
2 sentences1967Bondurant v. Mastin, 252 N.C. 190, 196 , 113 S.E. 2d 292, 296 , and cases cited. 1967Bondurant v. Mastin, 252 N.C. 190, 196 , 113 S.E. 2d 292, 296 , and cases cited. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.