Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sheetsgreen1 sentence2025See State v. Sheets, 2025-Ohio-355, ¶ 8, fn. 1 (10th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bradleygreen2 sentences2014The prejudice prong requires a finding that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different, with a reasonable probability being “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. at 694 ; see also State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989). {¶ 8} Upon review, we conclude that Cunningham’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is not supported by the record. 2014The prejudice prong requires a finding that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different, with a reasonable probability being “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. at 694 ; see also State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989). {¶ 8} Upon review, we conclude that Cunningham’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is not supported by the record. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bedfordgreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., State v. Bedford (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 122, 129 , 529 N.E.2d 913 . 2004See, e.g., State v. Bedford (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 122, 129 , 529 N.E.2d 913 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Weaver
green
1 sentence2025State v. Weaver, 2022-Ohio-4371, ¶ 24 . {¶11} Having reviewed the record, we cannot conclude that the trial court acted in an unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable manner when it denied Mr. Cunningham’s motion for leave without holding a hearing. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Blakemore v. Blakemore
green
1 sentence2025Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d at 219 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. Homick
green
1 sentence2021Cuyahoga No. 109343, 2020-Ohio-4919, ¶ 44 . {¶9} Here, Cunningham’s claim solely relates to the attorney-client privilege and protected attorney work product, and the parties agree that defense counsel first entered 4 Case No. 2021-P-0047 an appearance on Cunningham’s behalf on January 4, 2019. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Booker
green
1 sentence2021Franklin No. 15AP-42, 2015-Ohio-5118, ¶ 21 . {¶10} Because the trial court’s order denying the Cunningham’s motion neither considered nor ruled on the applicability of Marsy’s Law, the issue pertaining to victim rights under Marsy’s Law raised for the first time on appeal is not a justiciable issue. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Doss, Unpublished Decision (2-24-2005)
green
1 sentence2020Cuyahoga No. 84433, 2005-Ohio-775, ¶ 7 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Eafford
green
2 sentences2020Rather, this case is more akin to State v. Eafford, 132 Ohio St.3d 159 , 2012-Ohio-2224 , 970 N.E.2d 891 , a Supreme Court of Ohio decision decided in 2012, after Pelfrey but before McDonald. 2020Rather, this case is more akin to State v. Eafford, 132 Ohio St.3d 159 , 2012-Ohio-2224 , 970 N.E.2d 891 , a Supreme Court of Ohio decision decided in 2012, after Pelfrey but before McDonald. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2014The prejudice prong requires a finding that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different, with a reasonable probability being “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. at 694 ; see also State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989). {¶ 8} Upon review, we conclude that Cunningham’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is not supported by the record. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Shindler
green
1 sentence2001"In order to require a hearing on a motion to suppress, the accused must set forth the legal and factual bases with sufficient particularity to place the prosecutor and the court on notice of the issues to be decided." (Citations omitted.) State v. Schindler (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 54 , syllabus. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.