Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Namagreen2 sentences2010App. 3d 19, 30 , 689 N.E.2d 303, 311 (1997) (Cunningham doctrine -14- No. 08-2311 applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”), citing Cunningham, 154 Ill. 2d at 405 , 609 N.E.2d at 325 . 2010App. 3d 19, 29 , 689 N.E.2d 303, 311 (1997) (Cunningham doctrine applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”), citing Cunningham, 154 Ill. 2d at 405 , 609 N.E.2d at 325 . | 2 | 2 |
Feltmeier v. Feltmeiergreen2 sentences2010To quote our supreme court on the matter: “A continuing violation or tort is occasioned by continuing unlawful acts and conduct, not by continual ill effects from an initial violation. [Citations.] Thus, where there is a single overt act from which subsequent damages may flow, the statute begins to run on the date the defendant invaded the plaintiff’s interest and inflicted injury, and this is so despite the continuing nature of the injury.” Feltmeier v. Feltmeier, 207 Ill. 2d 263 , 278- 79, 798 N.E.2d 75, 85 (2003). 2010To quote our supreme court on the matter: “A continuing violation or tort is occasioned by continuing unlawful acts and conduct, not by continual ill effects from an initial violation. [Citations.] Thus, where there is a single overt act from which subsequent damages may flow, the statute begins to run on the date the defendant invaded the plaintiff’s interest and inflicted injury, and this is so despite the continuing nature of the injury.” Feltmeier v. Feltmeier, 207 Ill. 2d 263 , 278- 79, 798 N.E.2d 75, 85 (2003). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Calvertgreen2 sentences2012People v. Calvert, 326 Ill.App.3d 414, 419 , 260 Ill.Dec. 251 , 760 N.E.2d 1024 (2001) (parties who agree to admission of evidence through a stipulation cannot later complain about the evidence's admission into evidence). 2012People v. Calvert, 326 Ill.App.3d 414, 419 , 260 Ill.Dec. 251 , 760 N.E.2d 1024 (2001) (parties who agree to admission of evidence through a stipulation cannot later complain about the evidence's admission into evidence). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Nieves
green
2 sentences2012Nieves, 92 Ill.2d at 459 , 65 Ill.Dec. 917 , 442 N.E.2d 228 . ¶ 25 Cunningham's claim that the trial court did not determine that the overhear complied with the application and thus failed to meet the statute's requirements is contradicted by the record. 2012Nieves, 92 Ill.2d at 459 , 65 Ill.Dec. 917 , 442 N.E.2d 228 . ¶ 25 Cunningham's claim that the trial court did not determine that the overhear complied with the application and thus failed to meet the statute's requirements is contradicted by the record. | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Cunningham v. Huffman
green
2 sentences2010App. 3d 19, 30 , 689 N.E.2d 303, 311 (1997) (Cunningham doctrine -14- No. 08-2311 applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”), citing Cunningham, 154 Ill. 2d at 405 , 609 N.E.2d at 325 . 2010App. 3d 19, 30 , 689 N.E.2d 303, 311 (1997) (Cunningham doctrine -14- No. 08-2311 applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”), citing Cunningham, 154 Ill. 2d at 405 , 609 N.E.2d at 325 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
green
2 sentences2002According to the appellate court, cumulative medical negligence that, over time, results in injury that might otherwise be insignificant, is not unlike defendants' willful and wanton violation of the Act that, over a period of years, results in a loss to plaintiff that at some point becomes intolerable. 316 Ill.App.3d at 243-14, 250 Ill. 2002According to the appellate court, cumulative medical negligence that, over time, results in injury that might otherwise be insignificant, is not unlike defendants' willful and wanton violation of the Act that, over a period of years, results in a loss to plaintiff that at some point becomes intolerable. 316 Ill.App.3d at 243-14, 250 Ill. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.