weight of evidence challenge (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

weight of evidence challenge in Ohio

8 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Thompkinsred
ohio · 1997 · cited in 7 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2012–2014
2 sentences

2014State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 387 (1997).

2013State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 387 (1997).

57

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Schiebel green
ohio · 1990
2 sentences

2006Because reviewing courts should defer to the trial court in this situation, as the trier of fact, we must give proper deference to the court's findings regarding whether Appellant consented to a search. {¶ 27} Accordingly, we review the trial court's finding that Appellant voluntarily consented to the search under a weight of evidence standard, as set forth in State v. Schiebel (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 71 , 74 , 564 N.E.2d 54 .

2006Because reviewing courts should defer to the trial court in this situation, as the trier of fact, we must give proper deference to the court's findings regarding whether Appellant consented to a search. {¶ 27} Accordingly, we review the trial court's finding that Appellant voluntarily consented to the search under a weight of evidence standard, as set forth in State v. Schiebel (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 71 , 74 , 564 N.E.2d 54 .

12006–2006

Where else courts name it

PA 42 (2008–2026) OH 8 (2006–2014) NY 4 (2009–2024) MD 2 (1965–1967) MO 2 (2023–2024) TN 2 (1993–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check