Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Humphries v. Lorain City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2017Id. | 2 | 2017–2019 |
Hale v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Lanzo v. Campbell City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
neutral
1 sentence2019Mahoning No. 09 MA 154, 2010-Ohio-4779, ¶ 18 . {¶ 15} After proper written notice of a board’s intent to terminate along with full specification of the grounds for consideration of termination, a teacher or administrator may file a written demand for a hearing “before the board or before a referee.” R.C. 3319.16. {¶ 16} If a hearing is conducted before a referee, the referee must issue written report and the school board must accept the referee’s findings of fact unless those findings are against the greater weight, or preponderance, of the evidence. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Thomas v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn.
neutral
2 sentences2018After considering the referee's report, “the board, by a majority vote, may accept or reject the referee's recommendation on the termination of the teacher's contract.” Id. 2018The teacher may then file a written demand for a hearing “before the board or before a referee.” Id. * * * If a hearing is conducted by a referee, the referee must file a report. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Winland v. Strasburg-Franklin Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Elsass v. St. Marys City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
green
1 sentence2011The teacher may then file a written demand for a hearing “before the board or before a referee.”3 Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State Ex Rel. Jones v. Farrar
green
2 sentences1984Jones, v. Farrar (1946), 146 Ohio St. 467 [ 32 O.O. 542 ], where, at paragraph three of the syllabus, this court discussed the criteria to be employed in interpreting this type of provision, as follows: “As a general rule, a statute providing a time for the performance of an official duty will be construed as directory so far as time for performance is concerned, especially where the statute fixes the time simply for convenience or orderly procedure; and, unless the object or purpose of a statutory provision requiring some act to be performed within a specified period of time is discernible fr 1984Jones, v. Farrar (1946), 146 Ohio St. 467 [ 32 O.O. 542 ], where, at paragraph three of the syllabus, this court discussed the criteria to be employed in interpreting this type of provision, as follows: “As a general rule, a statute providing a time for the performance of an official duty will be construed as directory so far as time for performance is concerned, especially where the statute fixes the time simply for convenience or orderly procedure; and, unless the object or purpose of a statutory provision requiring some act to be performed within a specified period of time is discernible fr | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Jones v. Hannon
neutral
1 sentence1984Jones, v. Farrar (1946), 146 Ohio St. 467 [ 32 O.O. 542 ], where, at paragraph three of the syllabus, this court discussed the criteria to be employed in interpreting this type of provision, as follows: “As a general rule, a statute providing a time for the performance of an official duty will be construed as directory so far as time for performance is concerned, especially where the statute fixes the time simply for convenience or orderly procedure; and, unless the object or purpose of a statutory provision requiring some act to be performed within a specified period of time is discernible fr | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.