Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1974–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. Professional Practices Commissiongreen2 sentences1984See, 82 O.S.1981, § 1020.2, supra. Also, see, Adams v. Professional Practice Comm’n, 524 P.2d 932 (Okl.1974), which holds that an administrative agency may not under the guise of its rule making power act contrary to the statute which is the source of its authority. 1984See, 82 O.S. 1981 , § 1020.2, supra. Also, see, Adams v. Professional Practice Comm'n, 524 P.2d 932 (Okl. 1974), which holds that an administrative agency may not under the guise of its rule making power act contrary to the statute which is the source of its authority. | 1 | 6 |
Martin v. Reedgreen2 sentences1996“Those patients who may have negligently injured themselves are nevertheless entitled to subsequent non-negligent medical treatment and to an undiminished recovery if such subsequent non-negligent treatment is not afforded.” Martin v. Reed, 200 Ga.App. 775 , 409 S.E.2d 874, 877 (1991). 1996“Those patients who may have negligently injured themselves are nevertheless entitled to subsequent non-negligent medical treatment and to an undiminished recovery if such subsequent non-negligent treatment is not afforded.” Martin v. Reed, 200 Ga.App. 775 , 409 S.E.2d 874, 877 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes County
green
1 sentence1978Ct. of Mayes County, Okla., 440 P.2d 700 (Okl. 1967): "In absence of explicit legislative or constitutional expression to the contrary, the Attorney General possesses complete dominion over every litigation in which he properly appears in the interest of the State whether or not there is a realtor or some other nominal party." A state board or agency may not under the guise of its rule making, or in this case contract making, power extend the scope of its authority beyond those limits set by statute. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Boydston v. State
green
1 sentence1978Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138 (Okla. 1955); Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, 524 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
green
1 sentence1974Generally, when a rule or regulation is adopted and such rule conflicts with the statute granting said authority, the courts follow the rule as stated in Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 338 P.2d 50 (Cal. 1959) wherein the Court stated: "It is true that an administrative agency may not, under the guise of this rule making power, abridge or enlarge the authority or exceed the powers given to it by statute, the source of its power." Here, it is apparent that the Legislature has intended that the only fees contemplated are those set forth in Se | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.