8 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Black Hawk Oil Co. v. Exxon Corp.green2 sentences2010See Black Hawk, 1998 OK 70 at 17 , 969 P.2d at 348 ("The numerosity test is satisfied by numbers alone when the size of the class is in the hundreds."). 2006"The numerosity test is satisfied by numbers alone when the size of the class is in the hundreds." Black Hawk Oil Co. v. Exxon Corp., 1998 OK 70, 117 , 969 P.2d 3837 , 348. | 3 | 4 |
Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of Dallasgreen1 sentence2000NUMEROSITY (15 To satisfy the numerosity requirement of § 2023(A)(1), the party who seeks certification " ... must first adequately define the class and then establish that it is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Davoll v. Webb, 160 F.R.D. 142, 144 (D.Colo.1995), aff'd. by 194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir.(Colo.) 1999). "[Nlecessarily individualized inquiries are best suited to a case-by-case determination." Davoll, 160 F.R.D. at 146 , citing Chandler v. City of Dallas 2 F.3d 1385, 1396 (5th Cir.(Tex.)1983)(appeal after remand). {116 Appellants proposed three different class de | 1 | 1 |
Davoll v. Webbgreen2 sentences2000NUMEROSITY (15 To satisfy the numerosity requirement of § 2023(A)(1), the party who seeks certification " ... must first adequately define the class and then establish that it is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Davoll v. Webb, 160 F.R.D. 142, 144 (D.Colo.1995), aff'd. by 194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir.(Colo.) 1999). "[Nlecessarily individualized inquiries are best suited to a case-by-case determination." Davoll, 160 F.R.D. at 146 , citing Chandler v. City of Dallas 2 F.3d 1385, 1396 (5th Cir.(Tex.)1983)(appeal after remand). {116 Appellants proposed three different class de 2000NUMEROSITY (15 To satisfy the numerosity requirement of § 2023(A)(1), the party who seeks certification " ... must first adequately define the class and then establish that it is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Davoll v. Webb, 160 F.R.D. 142, 144 (D.Colo.1995), aff'd. by 194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir.(Colo.) 1999). "[Nlecessarily individualized inquiries are best suited to a case-by-case determination." Davoll, 160 F.R.D. at 146 , citing Chandler v. City of Dallas 2 F.3d 1385, 1396 (5th Cir.(Tex.)1983)(appeal after remand). {116 Appellants proposed three different class de | 1 | 1 |
Shores v. First City Bank Corp.green2 sentences1999See, Shores v. First City Bank Corp., 1984 OK 67 , 689 P.2d 299 . ¶ 5 In its order certifying Class A, the trial court found 1) the numerosity requirement had been satisfied based on DPS's July 3, 1995 affidavit stating that 24,000 persons are eligible for refunds and that joinder of all members is impracticable; 2) there are questions of law or fact common to all members of the class and the claims of the representatives are typical of the members of the class; 3) the questions of law or fact common to the class members predominate over any individual questions and that individual actions wou 1999See, Shores v. First City Bank Corp., 1984 OK 67 , 689 P.2d 299 . ¶ 5 In its order certifying Class A, the trial court found 1) the numerosity requirement had been satisfied based on DPS’s July 3, 1995 affidavit stating that 24,000 persons are eligible for refunds and that joinder of all members is impracticable; 2) there are questions of law or fact common to all members of the class and the claims of the representatives are typical of the members of the class; 3) the questions of law or fact common to the class members predominate over any individual questions and that individual actions wou | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
green
2 sentences1999A subsequent case, Crown, Cork & Seal Company Inc., v. Parker, 462 U.S. 345, 354 , 103 S.Ct. 2392, 2397-2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 628 (1983) concluded the American Pipe rule applies not only to those members who intervene after the denial of class certification but also those who file actions on their own and that “[o]nce the statute of limitations has been tolled, it remains tolled for all members of the putative class until class certification is denied.” (Emphasis added.) ¶ 7 SSAC argues there was no tolling because American Pipe limited the effect of its ruling to individuals who were denied class 1999A subsequent case, Crown, Cork & Seal Company Inc., v. Parker, 462 U.S. 345, 354 , 103 S.Ct. 2392, 2397-2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 628 (1983) concluded the American Pipe rule applies not only to those members who intervene after the denial of class certification but also those who file actions on their own and that “[o]nce the statute of limitations has been tolled, it remains tolled for all members of the putative class until class certification is denied.” (Emphasis added.) ¶ 7 SSAC argues there was no tolling because American Pipe limited the effect of its ruling to individuals who were denied class | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
green
2 sentences2008Certification of the class in this matter is also superior to countless individual suits with the inevitable "inconsistent results" for parties similarly situated and the likely prospect that most claims will be left unpressed because the individual "claims are not substantial enough to support individual litigation." Ysbrand, 2003 OK 17, ¶ 25 , 81 P.3d at 628 . 2008Certification of the class in this matter is also superior to countless individual suits with the inevitable "inconsistent results" for parties similarly situated and the likely prospect that most claims will be left unpressed because the individual "claims are not substantial enough to support individual litigation." Ysbrand, 2003 OK 17, ¶ 25 , 81 P.3d at 628 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Davoll v. Webb
green
1 sentence2000NUMEROSITY (15 To satisfy the numerosity requirement of § 2023(A)(1), the party who seeks certification " ... must first adequately define the class and then establish that it is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Davoll v. Webb, 160 F.R.D. 142, 144 (D.Colo.1995), aff'd. by 194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir.(Colo.) 1999). "[Nlecessarily individualized inquiries are best suited to a case-by-case determination." Davoll, 160 F.R.D. at 146 , citing Chandler v. City of Dallas 2 F.3d 1385, 1396 (5th Cir.(Tex.)1983)(appeal after remand). {116 Appellants proposed three different class de | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.