Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1990–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Campbell v. New Milford Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2001See Arduini, supra. "The plaintiff must show some evidence or a reasonable estimate of the number of class members." Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., supra at 583, citing to Campbell v. New Milford Board of Education, 36 Conn. Sup. 357 , 423 A.2d 900 (1980). 2001See Arduini, supra. "The plaintiff must show some evidence or a reasonable estimate of the number of class members." Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., supra at 583, citing to Campbell v. New Milford Board of Education, 36 Conn. Sup. 357 , 423 A.2d 900 (1980). | 3 | 3 |
Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2009“There is no magic number for determining whether, in a particular case, joinder of all putative parties will be impracticable. . . . [Rather] [t]he issue is one to be resolved in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” (Citations omitted.) Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., 44 Conn. Sup. 569, 583 , 695 A.2d 1095 (1996), aff'd, 241 Conn. 278, 282 , 694 A.2d 795 (1997) (adopting trial court’s opinion); 35 see also Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d *476 931, 936 (2d Cir. 1993) (“[d]etermination of practicability depends on all the circumstances surrounding a case, not on mere numbe 2009“There is no magic number for determining whether, in a particular case, joinder of all putative parties will be impracticable. . . . [Rather] [t]he issue is one to be resolved in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” (Citations omitted.) Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., 44 Conn. Sup. 569, 583 , 695 A.2d 1095 (1996), aff'd, 241 Conn. 278, 282 , 694 A.2d 795 (1997) (adopting trial court’s opinion); 35 see also Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d *476 931, 936 (2d Cir. 1993) (“[d]etermination of practicability depends on all the circumstances surrounding a case, not on mere numbe | 1 | 1 |
Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2009“There is no magic number for determining whether, in a particular case, joinder of all putative parties will be impracticable. . . . [Rather] [t]he issue is one to be resolved in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” (Citations omitted.) Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., 44 Conn. Sup. 569, 583 , 695 A.2d 1095 (1996), aff'd, 241 Conn. 278, 282 , 694 A.2d 795 (1997) (adopting trial court’s opinion); 35 see also Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d *476 931, 936 (2d Cir. 1993) (“[d]etermination of practicability depends on all the circumstances surrounding a case, not on mere numbe 2009“There is no magic number for determining whether, in a particular case, joinder of all putative parties will be impracticable. . . . [Rather] [t]he issue is one to be resolved in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” (Citations omitted.) Walsh v. National Safety Associates, Inc., 44 Conn. Sup. 569, 583 , 695 A.2d 1095 (1996), aff'd, 241 Conn. 278, 282 , 694 A.2d 795 (1997) (adopting trial court’s opinion); 35 see also Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d *476 931, 936 (2d Cir. 1993) (“[d]etermination of practicability depends on all the circumstances surrounding a case, not on mere numbe | 1 | 1 |
Robidoux v. Celanigreen1 sentence2002See Robidoux v. Celani , 987 F.2d 931 , 935 (2d Cir. 1993). 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Block v. First Blood Associates
green
1 sentence1991However, in Block v. First Blood Associates, 125 F.R.D. 39 , 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) the court stated ". . . although Riordan cites geographical dispersion of potential class members as a factor in determining practicability of joinder, such dispersion is not enough to meet Rule 23(a)'s arequirement." In Dannenberg v. Dorison, 603 F. Sup. 1238 (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the court indicated a reluctance to follow the cases using geographical dispersion as a basis for finding the numerosity requirement satisfied, stating "Rule 23(a)(1) by its terms requires that the number of potential class members make joind | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Patrykus v. Gomilla
green
1 sentence1990"In addition to estimating the number of class members, the court considers judicial economy and the ability of class members to institute individual suits." Patrykus v. Gomilla, 121 F.R.D. 357 , 361 (N.D. 11. 1988). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Marcial v. Coronet Insurance
green
1 sentence1990Id. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.