8 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 329 Or App 57, 63 , 540 P3d 73 (2023) (concluding that the defendant’s proposed interpretation of the statute was not plain because “[t]o conclusively resolve this legal issue of first impression, we would have to engage in an in-depth analysis of statu- tory text, context, and legislative history to a degree that 818 State v. C. 2026See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 329 Or App 57, 63 , 540 P3d 73 (2023) (concluding that the defendant’s proposed interpretation of the statute was not plain because “[t]o conclusively resolve this legal issue of first impression, we would have to engage in an in-depth analysis of statu- tory text, context, and legislative history to a degree that 818 State v. C. | 3 | 3 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulsongreen2 sentences2010Cf. In re Paulson, 341 Or 13, 27 , 136 P3d 1087 (2006) (“[N]ot every negligent or unprofessional act * * * gives rise to an ethical violation!!]”). 3 We need not resolve the factual disputes inherent in the accused’s version of the facts to decide this case. 4 Although the accused began representing Ms. Nickerson in 2003, the conduct at issue on review occurred after January 1, 2005, the effective date of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct; therefore, those rules apply here. 5 In light of this case’s procedural posture, an in-depth analysis of our basis for imposing a public reprimand wo 2010Cf. In re Paulson, 341 Or 13, 27 , 136 P3d 1087 (2006) (“[N]ot every negligent or unprofessional act * * * gives rise to an ethical violation!!]”). 3 We need not resolve the factual disputes inherent in the accused’s version of the facts to decide this case. 4 Although the accused began representing Ms. Nickerson in 2003, the conduct at issue on review occurred after January 1, 2005, the effective date of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct; therefore, those rules apply here. 5 In light of this case’s procedural posture, an in-depth analysis of our basis for imposing a public reprimand wo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System Laundry
green
2 sentences2023I would not read the statute to necessarily mean that the employer’s conduct and knowl- edge are always imputed to the insurer in all contexts without a more in-depth analysis of the text, context, and history of the statute. 3 The Court of Appeals has applied the “legitimate doubt” standard in sev- eral cases, tracing back to Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999 , 569 P2d 49 (1977). 2023I would not read the statute to necessarily mean that the employer’s conduct and knowl- edge are always imputed to the insurer in all contexts without a more in-depth analysis of the text, context, and history of the statute. 3 The Court of Appeals has applied the “legitimate doubt” standard in sev- eral cases, tracing back to Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999 , 569 P2d 49 (1977). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Ybarra v. Dominguez Family Enterprises, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022Cite as 322 Or App 798 (2022) 803 the corporation as a going concern, without application of minority or marketability discounts.” In short, in plain- tiff’s view (1) the court erred in ruling that it was required to apply the discounts in the absence of oppression and (2) minority or marketability discounts are never appropri- ate in determining fair value under ORS 60.952. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Kaady v. Department of Revenue
green
1 sentence2009ORS 305.275 requires that a taxpayer appealing to the Magistrate Division of the Oregon Tax Court be "aggrieved." This court has previously ruled that "[i]n requiring that taxpayers be `aggrieved' under ORS 305.275 , the legislature intended that the taxpayer have an immediate claim of wrong." Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Wong v. Tenneco, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001A few years after Stockton, the California Supreme Court undertook a more in-depth analysis of Article 27 in Wong v. Tenneco, Inc., 39 Cal 3d 126, 216 Cal Rptr 412, 702 P2d 570 (1985). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.