Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Valcarce v. Fitzgeraldgreen1 sentence2008See e.g., Vailcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 313 (Utah 1998) (stating that appellate courts will generally not address an argument that is inadequately briefed); see also Dimick v. OHC Iiquidation Trust, 2007 UT App 73 , ¶5 n. 4, 157 P.3d 347 (stating that court would not address claim of error regarding a 54(b) certification when claim was withdrawn at oral argument). | 1 | 1 |
Dimick v. OHC Liquidation Trustgreen2 sentences2008See e.g., Vailcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 313 (Utah 1998) (stating that appellate courts will generally not address an argument that is inadequately briefed); see also Dimick v. OHC Iiquidation Trust, 2007 UT App 73 , ¶5 n. 4, 157 P.3d 347 (stating that court would not address claim of error regarding a 54(b) certification when claim was withdrawn at oral argument). 2008See e.g., Vailcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 313 (Utah 1998) (stating that appellate courts will generally not address an argument that is inadequately briefed); see also Dimick v. OHC Iiquidation Trust, 2007 UT App 73 , ¶5 n. 4, 157 P.3d 347 (stating that court would not address claim of error regarding a 54(b) certification when claim was withdrawn at oral argument). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dalegreen2 sentences1992See State v. Dale, 439 N.W.2d 112, 115 (S.D.1989) (“Indigence should be considered upon a case by case basis” and should be considered “without resort to artificially pre-determined financial standards or guidelines.”)- In each case, the trial court must conduct an in-depth inquiry into each defendant’s unique financial situation, “balancing the assets and income against liabilities and other related factors.” Dale, 439 N.W.2d at 115 . 1992See State v. Dale, 439 N.W.2d 112, 115 (S.D.1989) (“Indigence should be considered upon a case by case basis” and should be considered “without resort to artificially pre-determined financial standards or guidelines.”)- In each case, the trial court must conduct an in-depth inquiry into each defendant’s unique financial situation, “balancing the assets and income against liabilities and other related factors.” Dale, 439 N.W.2d at 115 . | 1 | 1 |
Barry v. Browergreen1 sentence1992INDIGENCY GENERALLY We note initially that “[ijndigence is not equivalent to total destitution.” Barry v. Brower, 864 F.2d 294, 299 (3rd Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Commissiongreen2 sentences1991The court recognized its holding in Savage Industries Inc. v. Utah State Tax Comm’n, 811 P.2d 664, 668-71 (Utah 1991) that section 63-46b-16(4)(d) suggests a correction of error standard of review when the court reviewing statutory construction is in as good a position as the agency to interpret the statute and indicated that “a court may decide that the agency has erroneously interpreted the law if the court merely disagrees with the agency’s interpretation.” Morton Int’l, 814 P.2d at 587 (quoting Savage Industries, 811 P.2d at 669-70 ) (quoting Model State Admin.Procedure Act § 5-116, 15 U.L 1991The court recognized its holding in Savage Industries Inc. v. Utah State Tax Comm’n, 811 P.2d 664, 668-71 (Utah 1991) that section 63-46b-16(4)(d) suggests a correction of error standard of review when the court reviewing statutory construction is in as good a position as the agency to interpret the statute and indicated that “a court may decide that the agency has erroneously interpreted the law if the court merely disagrees with the agency’s interpretation.” Morton Int’l, 814 P.2d at 587 (quoting Savage Industries, 811 P.2d at 669-70 ) (quoting Model State Admin.Procedure Act § 5-116, 15 U.L | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kooncegreen1 sentence1991Super. 169, 183-84 , 214 A.2d 428, 435-36 (1965); State v. Doe, 92 N.M. 100, 102-03 , 583 P.2d 464, 467 (1978); Columbus v. Fraley, 41 Ohio St.2d 173, 179-80 , 324 N.E.2d 735 (1975). [3] In Moreira , the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts conducted an in-depth analysis of this issue. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Doegreen2 sentences1991Super. 169, 183-84 , 214 A.2d 428, 435-36 (1965); State v. Doe, 92 N.M. 100, 102-03 , 583 P.2d 464, 467 (1978); Columbus v. Fraley, 41 Ohio St.2d 173, 179-80 , 324 N.E.2d 735 (1975). [3] In Moreira , the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts conducted an in-depth analysis of this issue. 1991Super. 169, 183-84 , 214 A.2d 428, 435-36 (1965); State v. Doe, 92 N.M. 100, 102-03 , 583 P.2d 464, 467 (1978); Columbus v. Fraley, 41 Ohio St.2d 173, 179-80 , 324 N.E.2d 735 (1975). [3] In Moreira , the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts conducted an in-depth analysis of this issue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pedersen
green
2 sentences1992For a more in-depth analysis of this court’s reasoning on the appropriateness of the trial court's reasonable doubt instruction, see Peder-sen, 802 P.2d at 1331-32 . 1991For a more in-depth analysis of the reasonable doubt instruction meeting the requirements set forth by Justice Stewart in his dissent in Ireland, see Pedersen, 802 P.2d at 1331-32 . 7 . | 2 | 1991–1992 |
Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission
green
2 sentences1991The court recognized its holding in Savage Industries Inc. v. Utah State Tax Comm’n, 811 P.2d 664, 668-71 (Utah 1991) that section 63-46b-16(4)(d) suggests a correction of error standard of review when the court reviewing statutory construction is in as good a position as the agency to interpret the statute and indicated that “a court may decide that the agency has erroneously interpreted the law if the court merely disagrees with the agency’s interpretation.” Morton Int’l, 814 P.2d at 587 (quoting Savage Industries, 811 P.2d at 669-70 ) (quoting Model State Admin.Procedure Act § 5-116, 15 U.L 1991Morton Int’l v. Auditing Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm’n, 814 P.2d 581 , 586-88 (Utah 1991). | 2 | 1991–1991 |
In re K.M.
neutral
1 sentence2025In fact, the custody evaluator testified that while Mother did appear to have “some significant mental health issues,” he acknowledged that his assessment of her condition was “somewhat of a triage diagnosis as opposed to . . . an in-depth analysis.” However, the evaluator testified that “despite [his] concern about her mental health, the best evidence that we have suggests that she’s able to adequately care for her own children.” And when asked if he felt “comfortable stating that both . . . the 20230945-CA 16 2025 UT App 17 In re K.M. natural parents would be adequately able to parent the ch | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Perkins
green
1 sentence2024Thus, the court did not commit reversible error when it did not engage in a colloquy with Perkins on self-representation or substitution of counsel. ¶34 Affirmed. 20220746-CA 14 2024 UT App 101 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Belgard
green
1 sentence1991Utah Code Ann. § 77-14-2 (4) (1990) states: ‘The court may, for good cause shown, waive the requirements of this section.” Compare State v. Belgard, 811 P.2d 211 (Utah App.1991) (trial court must expressly find good cause to set aside a waiver under Rule 12 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
City of Columbus v. Fraley
green
2 sentences1991Super. 169, 183-84 , 214 A.2d 428, 435-36 (1965); State v. Doe, 92 N.M. 100, 102-03 , 583 P.2d 464, 467 (1978); Columbus v. Fraley, 41 Ohio St.2d 173, 179-80 , 324 N.E.2d 735 (1975). [3] In Moreira , the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts conducted an in-depth analysis of this issue. 1991Super. 169, 183-84 , 214 A.2d 428, 435-36 (1965); State v. Doe, 92 N.M. 100, 102-03 , 583 P.2d 464, 467 (1978); Columbus v. Fraley, 41 Ohio St.2d 173, 179-80 , 324 N.E.2d 735 (1975). [3] In Moreira , the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts conducted an in-depth analysis of this issue. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Commonwealth v. Moreira
green
2 sentences1991Through its research, it concluded that at that time eleven states by judicial decision and nineteen states by legislative enactment had determined that "a person may not resist an unlawful arrest which is accomplished without excessive force." Moreira, 388 Mass. at 600 , 447 N.E.2d at 1228 . [4] The Alaska Supreme Court addressed an additional issue in Elson . 1991Through its research, it concluded that at that time eleven states by judicial decision and nineteen states by legislative enactment had determined that "a person may not resist an unlawful arrest which is accomplished without excessive force." Moreira, 388 Mass. at 600 , 447 N.E.2d at 1228 . [4] The Alaska Supreme Court addressed an additional issue in Elson . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Johns Hopkins University v. Williams
green
2 sentences1986An in-depth analysis of what constitutes the lending of credit was made by the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Johns Hopkins University v. Williams, 199 Md. 382 , 86 A.2d 892 (1952). 1986An in-depth analysis of what constitutes the lending of credit was made by the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Johns Hopkins University v. Williams, 199 Md. 382 , 86 A.2d 892 (1952). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.