pleadings framework (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

pleadings framework in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
M. K. F. v. Miramontesgreen
or · 2012 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

11
Matter of Estate of Hurlbuttgreen
orctapp · 1978 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962).

1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962).

11
Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.green
or · 1972 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
2 sentences

1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120.

1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120.

11
Hamilton v. Johnsongreen
wash · 1925 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
1 sentence

1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
State v. HERRERASORROSA green
orctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

12016–2016
Ying v. Lee neutral
orctapp · 1983
2 sentences

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

12016–2016
Hucke v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, L.P. neutral
orctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider

12016–2016
Salem Sand & Gravel Company v. City of Salem green
or · 1971
2 sentences

1988Granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is appropriate only “when the pleadings taken together affirmatively show that plaintiff has no cause of action * * *.” Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 636 , 492 P2d 271 (1971).

1988Granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is appropriate only “when the pleadings taken together affirmatively show that plaintiff has no cause of action * * *.” Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 636 , 492 P2d 271 (1971).

11988–1988
Rajneesh Foundation International v. McGreer neutral
orctapp · 1986
2 sentences

1987Rajneesh Foundation v. McGreer, 80 Or App 168 , 721 P2d 867 (1986).

1987Rajneesh Foundation v. McGreer, 80 Or App 168 , 721 P2d 867 (1986).

11987–1987
Heintz v. SINNER ET UX green
or · 1962
2 sentences

1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962).

1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962).

11983–1983
Borgert v. SPURLING green
or · 1951
2 sentences

1979An admission in the pleadings is a waiver of all controversy on the matter admitted, Borgert v. Spurling et at., 191 Or 344 , 230 P2d 183 (1951); additional evidence is superfluous.

1979An admission in the pleadings is a waiver of all controversy on the matter admitted, Borgert v. Spurling et at., 191 Or 344 , 230 P2d 183 (1951); additional evidence is superfluous.

11979–1979
Idaho Placer Mining Co. v. Green green
· 1908
2 sentences

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

11930–1930
Miller v. Houston green
coloctapp · 1915
1 sentence

1930The assumption that the physician was negligent in treating plaintiff is based upon the condition of the pleadings under the rule stated in Miller v. Houston, 27 Colo. App. 89 ( 146 P. 786 ), that: “When a party moves for judgment on the pleadings, he not only, for the purpose of his motion, admits the allegation of his adversary, but also the untruth of all his own allegations that have been denied by his adversary: Idaho Placer M.

11930–1930
Miller v. Houston green
coloctapp · 1915
1 sentence

1930The assumption that the physician was negligent in treating plaintiff is based upon the condition of the pleadings under the rule stated in Miller v. Houston, 27 Colo. App. 89 ( 146 P. 786 ), that: “When a party moves for judgment on the pleadings, he not only, for the purpose of his motion, admits the allegation of his adversary, but also the untruth of all his own allegations that have been denied by his adversary: Idaho Placer M.

11930–1930
Estate of Griffith green
· 1926
1 sentence

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

11930–1930
Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co. green
or · 1926
2 sentences

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

11930–1930
Smith v. Aplanalp neutral
or · 1928
2 sentences

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ).

11930–1930
Chase v. Christianson neutral
cal · 1871
1 sentence

1901Rendering a judgment for a greater amount than authorized by the pleadings is an error or irregularity, within the meaning of this rule, and it is immaterial that it was by default: Chase v. Christianson, 41 Cal. 253 ; Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Pub.

11901–1901
Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co. green
ind · 1895
2 sentences

1901Co., 140 Ind. 158 ( 39 N. E. 443 , 30 L.

1901Co., 140 Ind. 158 ( 39 N. E. 443 , 30 L.

11901–1901

Where else courts name it

TX 67 (1890–2026) TN 38 (2007–2026) CA 36 (1900–2026) IL 32 (1912–2024) NY 25 (1848–2025) FL 20 (1938–2025) GA 14 (1927–2025) WI 14 (1906–2025) MO 13 (1909–2024) MA 13 (1935–2020) LA 12 (1943–2024) OH 11 (2001–2024) MS 11 (1966–2019) PA 10 (1931–2023) DE 10 (2016–2026) RI 9 (1968–2025) NC 9 (1890–2018) AL 9 (1983–2026) UT 8 (1998–2025) OR 8 (1901–2016) OK 5 (1912–1975) MI 5 (1938–2019) NJ 5 (1855–2010) KS 5 (1912–1995) ME 5 (2004–2018) IA 5 (1922–2022) CT 5 (1933–2013) WA 4 (1931–2023) MT 4 (1995–2007) SC 4 (1941–2020) NM 4 (1964–2012) WY 3 (1979–1993) DC 3 (1951–2008) CO 2 (1907–1936) ND 2 (1915–1991) IN 2 (1970–1996) VA 2 (1997–1999) KY 2 (1897–1961) WV 2 (1959–2019) AR 2 (1928–1934)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check