8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
M. K. F. v. Miramontesgreen2 sentences2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider 2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Estate of Hurlbuttgreen2 sentences1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962). 1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.green2 sentences1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120. 1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120. | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1975See Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 214 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Hamilton v. Johnson, 137 Wash 92, 241 P 672, 673 (1925); ORS 16.120. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. HERRERASORROSA
green
2 sentences2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider 2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ying v. Lee
neutral
2 sentences2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider 2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hucke v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
neutral
2 sentences2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider 2016F. v. Miramontes, 352 Or 401, 425 , 287 P3d 1045 (2012) (“[W]e look to the pleadings to ascertain the nature of the relief that plaintiff requested.”); Ying v. Lee, 65 Or App 246, 251 , 671 P2d 114 (1983), rev den, 296 Or 487 (1984) (“The general rule is, of course, that the pleadings provide the framework within which relief may be granted.”); State v. Herrera-Sorrosa, 155 Or App 227, 229 , 963 P2d 728 (1998) (declining to apply the Ball v. Gladden doctrine because “we cannot infer that the trial court resolved disputed facts consistently with an analysis that it * * * could not have consider | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Salem Sand & Gravel Company v. City of Salem
green
2 sentences1988Granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is appropriate only “when the pleadings taken together affirmatively show that plaintiff has no cause of action * * *.” Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 636 , 492 P2d 271 (1971). 1988Granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is appropriate only “when the pleadings taken together affirmatively show that plaintiff has no cause of action * * *.” Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 636 , 492 P2d 271 (1971). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Rajneesh Foundation International v. McGreer
neutral
2 sentences1987Rajneesh Foundation v. McGreer, 80 Or App 168 , 721 P2d 867 (1986). 1987Rajneesh Foundation v. McGreer, 80 Or App 168 , 721 P2d 867 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Heintz v. SINNER ET UX
green
2 sentences1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962). 1983See Hurlbutt v. Hurlbutt, 36 Or App 721, 725 , 585 P2d 724 , rev den 285 Or 73 (1979); Heintz v. Sinner et ux, 232 Or 529, 533 , 376 P2d 478 (1962). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Borgert v. SPURLING
green
2 sentences1979An admission in the pleadings is a waiver of all controversy on the matter admitted, Borgert v. Spurling et at., 191 Or 344 , 230 P2d 183 (1951); additional evidence is superfluous. 1979An admission in the pleadings is a waiver of all controversy on the matter admitted, Borgert v. Spurling et at., 191 Or 344 , 230 P2d 183 (1951); additional evidence is superfluous. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Idaho Placer Mining Co. v. Green
green
2 sentences1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). 1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Miller v. Houston
green
1 sentence1930The assumption that the physician was negligent in treating plaintiff is based upon the condition of the pleadings under the rule stated in Miller v. Houston, 27 Colo. App. 89 ( 146 P. 786 ), that: “When a party moves for judgment on the pleadings, he not only, for the purpose of his motion, admits the allegation of his adversary, but also the untruth of all his own allegations that have been denied by his adversary: Idaho Placer M. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Miller v. Houston
green
1 sentence1930The assumption that the physician was negligent in treating plaintiff is based upon the condition of the pleadings under the rule stated in Miller v. Houston, 27 Colo. App. 89 ( 146 P. 786 ), that: “When a party moves for judgment on the pleadings, he not only, for the purpose of his motion, admits the allegation of his adversary, but also the untruth of all his own allegations that have been denied by his adversary: Idaho Placer M. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Estate of Griffith
green
1 sentence1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co.
green
2 sentences1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). 1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Smith v. Aplanalp
neutral
2 sentences1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). 1930Co. v. Green, 14 Idaho 294 ( 94 P. 161 ).” *463 For cases holding to the same effect see Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co., 119 Or. 44 ( 247 P. 155 , 248 P. 156 ); Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or. 213 ( 267 P. 1070 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Chase v. Christianson
neutral
1 sentence1901Rendering a judgment for a greater amount than authorized by the pleadings is an error or irregularity, within the meaning of this rule, and it is immaterial that it was by default: Chase v. Christianson, 41 Cal. 253 ; Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Pub. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.
green
2 sentences1901Co., 140 Ind. 158 ( 39 N. E. 443 , 30 L. 1901Co., 140 Ind. 158 ( 39 N. E. 443 , 30 L. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.