14 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1906–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bay View Packing Co. v. Taffgreen2 sentences2025Further, “[o]n summary judgment, we must draw all justifiable inferences in favor of the non-moving party, including questions of credibility and of the weight to be accorded particular evidence.” Id. at 672-73 (internal citations omitted); Terry v. Journal Broad. 2013Further, "[o]n summary judgment, we must draw all justifiable inferences in favor of the non-moving party, including questions of credibility and of the weight to be accorded particular evidence." Id., at 672-73 (internal citations, quoted sources and footnote omitted; brackets in Bay View Packing). ¶ 14. | 3 | 3 |
Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKgreen2 sentences2025See Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate Bank, 2006 WI 69, ¶16 , 291 Wis. 2d 283 , 717 N.W.2d 17 . ¶10 “If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party’s affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment[.]” L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 683 . 2025See Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate Bank, 2006 WI 69, ¶16 , 291 Wis. 2d 283 , 717 N.W.2d 17 . ¶10 “If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party’s affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment[.]” L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 683 . | 1 | 1 |
L.L.N. v. Claudergreen1 sentence2025See Hoida, Inc. v. M & I Midstate Bank, 2006 WI 69, ¶16 , 291 Wis. 2d 283 , 717 N.W.2d 17 . ¶10 “If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party’s affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment[.]” L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 683 . | 1 | 1 |
Prah v. Marettigreen2 sentences2020See Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228 , 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988) (for the purpose of conducting judgment on the pleadings analysis, “‘the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, are accepted as true’” (quoting Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 229 , 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982))). 2020See Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228 , 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988) (for the purpose of conducting judgment on the pleadings analysis, “‘the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, are accepted as true’” (quoting Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 229 , 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982))). | 1 | 1 |
Schuster v. Altenberggreen2 sentences2020See Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228 , 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988) (for the purpose of conducting judgment on the pleadings analysis, “‘the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, are accepted as true’” (quoting Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 229 , 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982))). 2020See Schuster v. Altenberg, 144 Wis. 2d 223, 228 , 424 N.W.2d 159 (1988) (for the purpose of conducting judgment on the pleadings analysis, “‘the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, are accepted as true’” (quoting Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 229 , 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982))). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
green
2 sentences2015Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315 , 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). 2015Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315 , 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). | 2 | 1996–2015 |
Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2001Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192 Wis. 2d 429, 436-37 , 531 N.W.2d 606 (Ct. App. 1995) (citations omitted). ¶ 7. 2001Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192 Wis. 2d 429, 436-37 , 531 N.W.2d 606 (Ct. App. 1995) (citations omitted). ¶ 7. | 2 | 1995–2001 |
State Bank of La Crosse v. Elsen
green
2 sentences1989State Bank of La Crosse, 128 Wis. 2d at 511 , 383 N.W.2d at 917 . 1989State Bank of La Crosse, 128 Wis. 2d at 511 , 383 N.W.2d at 917 . | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Petzel v. Valley Orthopedics Ltd.
green
2 sentences2025“If a moving party has established a prima facie case, the opposing party must then establish that there are disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from which reasonable alternative inferences could be drawn, that entitle such a party to a trial.” Baumeister v. Automated Prods., Inc., 2004 WI 148, ¶12 , 277 Wis. 2d 21 , 690 N.W.2d 1 . ¶11 “When deciding whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we view the evidence, and the reasonable inferences from that evidence, in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Petzel v. Valley Orthopedics Ltd., 2009 WI App 106, ¶5 2025“If a moving party has established a prima facie case, the opposing party must then establish that there are disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from which reasonable alternative inferences could be drawn, that entitle such a party to a trial.” Baumeister v. Automated Prods., Inc., 2004 WI 148, ¶12 , 277 Wis. 2d 21 , 690 N.W.2d 1 . ¶11 “When deciding whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we view the evidence, and the reasonable inferences from that evidence, in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Petzel v. Valley Orthopedics Ltd., 2009 WI App 106, ¶5 | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Baumeister v. Automated Products, Inc.
green
2 sentences2025“If a moving party has established a prima facie case, the opposing party must then establish that there are disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from which reasonable alternative inferences could be drawn, that entitle such a party to a trial.” Baumeister v. Automated Prods., Inc., 2004 WI 148, ¶12 , 277 Wis. 2d 21 , 690 N.W.2d 1 . ¶11 “When deciding whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we view the evidence, and the reasonable inferences from that evidence, in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Petzel v. Valley Orthopedics Ltd., 2009 WI App 106, ¶5 2025“If a moving party has established a prima facie case, the opposing party must then establish that there are disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from which reasonable alternative inferences could be drawn, that entitle such a party to a trial.” Baumeister v. Automated Prods., Inc., 2004 WI 148, ¶12 , 277 Wis. 2d 21 , 690 N.W.2d 1 . ¶11 “When deciding whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we view the evidence, and the reasonable inferences from that evidence, in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Petzel v. Valley Orthopedics Ltd., 2009 WI App 106, ¶5 | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Grams v. Boss
green
2 sentences1997If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under § 802.08(2). [6] See, e.g., Voss, 162 Wis. 2d at 747-48 ; Grams, 97 Wis. 2d at 338 . 1997If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under § 802.08(2). 6 See, e.g., Voss, 162 Wis. 2d at 747-48 ; Grams, 97 Wis. 2d at 338 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Voss v. City of Middleton
green
2 sentences1997If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under § 802.08(2). [6] See, e.g., Voss, 162 Wis. 2d at 747-48 ; Grams, 97 Wis. 2d at 338 . 1997If the pleadings state a claim and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under § 802.08(2). 6 See, e.g., Voss, 162 Wis. 2d at 747-48 ; Grams, 97 Wis. 2d at 338 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In Re Cherokee Park Plat
green
2 sentences1984In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis. 2d 112 , 116, 334 N.W.2d 580 , 583 (Ct. App. 1983). 1984In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis. 2d 112 , 116, 334 N.W.2d 580 , 583 (Ct. App. 1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Cromwell v. County of Sac
green
1 sentence1906Hence the judgment in the former action upon a different cause of action is not binding here., Wentworth v. Racine Co. 99 Wis. 26 , 74 N. W. 551 ; Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; 1 Van Fleet, Former Adj. § 30. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Wentworth v. Racine County
green
1 sentence1906Hence the judgment in the former action upon a different cause of action is not binding here., Wentworth v. Racine Co. 99 Wis. 26 , 74 N. W. 551 ; Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; 1 Van Fleet, Former Adj. § 30. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Ellis v. Lampman
neutral
1 sentence1906Hence the judgment in the former action upon a different cause of action is not binding here., Wentworth v. Racine Co. 99 Wis. 26 , 74 N. W. 551 ; Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; 1 Van Fleet, Former Adj. § 30. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.