third level analysis (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

third level analysis in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industriesred
or · 1993 · cited in 7 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1995–2006
2 sentences

2006In my view, analyzing the statute under the first and second levels under PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), does not demonstrate clearly what the legislature intended — that is, whether the revocation of an angling license encompasses “free fishing weekend” — so it is necessary to reach the third level of analysis.

2006In my view, analyzing the statute under the first and second levels under PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), does not demonstrate clearly what the legislature intended — that is, whether the revocation of an angling license encompasses “free fishing weekend” — so it is necessary to reach the third level of analysis.

27
Kell v. Oppenlandergreen
orctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See, e.g., ORS 42.230; ORS 42.240; see also Kell v. Oppenlander, 154 Or.App. 422, 426 , 961 P.2d 861 (1998) (applying ORS 42.230 at the first level of Yogman methodology); cf. State ex rel Juv.

2002See, e.g., ORS 42.230; ORS 42.240; see also Kell v. Oppenlander, 154 Or App 422,426 ,961P2d861 (1998) (applying ORS 42.230 at the first level of Yogman methodology); cf. State ex rel Juv.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Steelman-Duff, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. green
or · 1996
1 sentence

1996We decline to do so. 7 In Steelman-Duff, 323 Or at 235-36 , this court, in interpreting the attorney-fees provision of ORS 297.067(4), reached the third level of analysis under PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 612 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993).

11996–1996

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 174.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 8 (1995–2006) IL 4 (1983–1999) NY 3 (1981–2025) CA 2 (2015–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check