Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bartramgreen2 sentences2013State v. Bartram, 925 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Tenn. 1996); see also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 243 (1973) (holding that “there is nothing constitutionally suspect in a person’s voluntarily allowing a search”). 2011State v. Bartram, 925 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Tenn. 1996). | 8 | 8 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen2 sentences2013State v. Bartram, 925 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Tenn. 1996); see also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 243 (1973) (holding that “there is nothing constitutionally suspect in a person’s voluntarily allowing a search”). 2009State v. Bartram, 925 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Tenn. 1996) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S. Ct. 2041 (1973)). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Brownred1 sentence2005State v. Bartram, 925 S.W.2d 227, 230 (Tenn. 1996) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S. Ct. 2041 (1973)). “[T]o pass constitutional muster, consent to search must be unequivocal, specific, intelligently given, and uncontaminated by duress or coercion.” State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 547 (Tenn. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.