Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sanchez v. Stategreen2 sentences2026App. 2024). 2 “But errors that are subject to procedural default may not be remedied by the appellate court as unassigned error unless the error was in fact preserved in the trial court.” Sanchez v. State, 209 S.W.3d 117, 121 (Tex. Crim. 2024App. 2019) (not designated for publication) (“Generally, ‘appellate courts are free to review ‘unassigned error’ – a claim that was preserved in the trial court below but was not raised on appeal.’ However, errors that are subject to procedural default may not be remedied by the appellate court as unassigned error unless the error was in fact preserved in the trial court.”) (citing Sanchez v. Heath – 9 court that counsel’s discovery request was inadequate or failed to trigger its duty under Article 39.14. 16 Thus, we held the issue was not preserved and 15F the court of appeals erred to reach | 6 | 6 |
Pena v. Stategreen2 sentences2025App. 2006) (“But errors that are subject to procedural default may not be remedied by the appellate court as unassigned error unless the error was in fact preserved in the trial court.”); Pena v. State, 191 S.W.3d 133, 136 (Tex. Crim. 2024App. 2006) (quoting Pena v. State, 191 S.W.3d 133, 136 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||