Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hong Kong Development, Inc. v. Nguyengreen2 sentences2011See Hong Kong Dev., Inc. v. Nguyen , 229 S.W.3d 415 , 455–56 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (“When an appellate court sustains a challenge that attorney’s fees were not properly segregated, the remedy is to sever that portion of the judgment awarding attorney's fees and to remand the cause for the issue to be relitigated.”). 2011See Hong Kong Development, Inc. v. Nguyen , 229 S.W.3d 415 , 455–56 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (“When an appellate court sustains a challenge that attorney’s fees were not properly segregated, the remedy is to sever that portion of the judgment awarding attorney’s fees and to remand the cause for the issue to be relitigated.”). | 4 | 4 |
A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc. v. Beyergreen2 sentences2008Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Beyer , 235 S.W.3d 704, 710 (Tex. 2007); see also Nguyen, 229 S.W.3d at 455-56 ("When an appellate court sustains a challenge that attorney's fees were not properly segregated, the remedy is to sever that portion of the judgment awarding attorney's fees and to remand the cause for the issue to be relitigated ."). 2008Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Beyer, -9- 04-07-00531-CV 235 S.W.3d 704, 710 (Tex. 2007); see also Nguyen, 229 S.W.3d at 455-56 (“When an appellate court sustains a challenge that attorney’s fees were not properly segregated, the remedy is to sever that portion of the judgment awarding attorney’s fees and to remand the cause for the issue to be relitigated.”). | 2 | 2 |
Brown v. Traylorgreen2 sentences2007See Sterling , 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa , 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor , 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney's fees was issue that was separable under Tex. R. 2007See Sterling, 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa, 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor, 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney’s fees was issue that was separable under Tex.R.App. | 2 | 2 |
Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Sterlinggreen2 sentences2007See Sterling , 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa , 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor , 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney's fees was issue that was separable under Tex. R. 2007See Sterling, 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa, 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor, 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney’s fees was issue that was separable under Tex.R.App. | 2 | 2 |
Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury Chapagreen2 sentences2007See Sterling , 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa , 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor , 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney's fees was issue that was separable under Tex. R. 2007See Sterling, 822 S.W.2d at 11-12 ; accord Chapa, 212 S.W.3d at 314 ; see also Brown v. Traylor, 210 S.W.3d 648, 659-60 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (holding that amount of attorney’s fees was issue that was separable under Tex.R.App. | 2 | 2 |
Wright Way Spraying Service v. Butlergreen1 sentence2022See Wright Way Spraying Serv. v. Butler, 690 S.W.2d 897, 898 (Tex. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
AutoZone, Inc. v. Reyesgreen1 sentence2013See AutoZone, Inc. v. Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 595 (Tex. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||