Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
8100 NORTH FREEWAY LTD. v. City of Houstongreen2 sentences2022However, when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminent, irreparable injury. 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (citing Butnaru, 84 S.W.3d at 210 ). 2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen | 5 | 6 |
City of Houston v. Shayn A. Prolergreen2 sentences2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen 2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen | 4 | 4 |
Cook v. Tom Brown Ministriesgreen2 sentences2020App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1973, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (interpreting a provision in the former Open Beach Act, the court concluded that the applicant need not show irreparable injury); see also Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, 385 S.W.3d 592, 599 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2012, pet. denied) (applying Texas Election Code section 273.081, the El Paso Court of Appeals held that “the statute’s express language supersedes the common law injunctive relief elements such as imminent harm or irreparable injury and lack of an adequate remedy at law”). 2020App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1973, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (interpreting a provision in the former Open Beach Act, the court concluded that the applicant need not show irreparable injury); see also Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, 385 S.W.3d 592, 599 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2012, pet. denied) (applying Texas Election Code section 273.081, the El Paso Court of Appeals held that “the statute’s express language supersedes the common law injunctive relief elements such as imminent harm or irreparable injury and lack of an adequate remedy at law”). | 4 | 4 |
City of Houston v. Shayn A. Prolergreen2 sentences2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen 2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen | 4 | 4 |
Gulf Holding Corporation v. Brazoria Countygreen2 sentences2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen 2020See, e.g., City of Houston v. Proler, 373 S.W.3d 748, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012), rev’d on other grounds, 437 S.W.3d 529 (Tex. 2014) (concluding 27 that Texas Labor Code section 21.258 “supersed[ed] the equitable requirements generally applicable to common-law injunctive relief”); 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (analyzing section 243.010 of the Local Government Code and concluding that, “when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminen | 4 | 4 |
Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.green2 sentences2022See Butnaru, 84 S.W.3d at 210 ; 8100 North Freeway Ltd., 329 S.W.3d at 861 . 2022However, when the applicant has shown a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, it need not prove imminent, irreparable injury. 8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 861 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (citing Butnaru, 84 S.W.3d at 210 ). | 3 | 4 |
Ralph Williams Gulfgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Butnaru , 84 S.W.3d at 210 ; West v. State , 212 S.W.3d 513 , 518–19 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.); Ralph Williams Gulfgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. State , 466 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex. Civ. 2010See Butnaru,, 84 S.W.3d at 210 ; West v. State, 212 S.W.3d 513, 518-19 (Tex.App.Austin 2006, no pet.); Ralph Williams Gulfgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. State, 466 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1971,- writ refd n.r.e.). | 2 | 2 |
DAVID JASON WEST AND PYDIA, INC. v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Butnaru , 84 S.W.3d at 210 ; West v. State , 212 S.W.3d 513 , 518–19 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.); Ralph Williams Gulfgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. State , 466 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex. Civ. 2010See Butnaru,, 84 S.W.3d at 210 ; West v. State, 212 S.W.3d 513, 518-19 (Tex.App.Austin 2006, no pet.); Ralph Williams Gulfgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. State, 466 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1971,- writ refd n.r.e.). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.