Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Deeringergreen2 sentences2018If a party moves for a nunc pro tunc order seeking jail-time credits and the convicting court fails to rule on or inappropriately denies the motion, “the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.” Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617–18 (Tex. Crim. 2012ANN. art. 42.03, § 2(a)(1). 4 appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.” Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617–18 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 5 |
In Re Daisygreen2 sentences2009See Ex parte Ybarra, 149 5.W.3d at 149; Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617-18 & n. 7 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (“[B]efore we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc, and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.”); see also In re Daisy, 156 S.W.3d at 924 (“Further, if a motion for a nunc pro tunc order for back time c 2009App. 2006) ("[B]efore we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc , and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule."); see also In re Daisy , 156 S.W.3d at 924 ("Further, if a motion for a nunc pro tunc order for back time credit is filed and the trial judge fails to respond, relief may be sought by petition for writ of m | 2 | 2 |
In Re Blakeneygreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., In re Johnson, 07-10-0254-CV, 2011 Tex. App. Lexis 4886, at *4-5 (Tex.App.--Amarillo June 28, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Duffy, No. 07-09-0090-CV, 2009 Tex. App. Lexis 2738, at *4-5 (Tex.App.-- Amarillo Apr. 20, 2009, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); accord In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d at 661 ; In re Castle Tex. Prod. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Ybarra
green
1 sentence2010Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d at 149 . ―Before we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the 8 omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc, and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.’‖ Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616, 617-18 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Ex Parte Esquivel
green
1 sentence1979The court also found “That Defendant has not in any manner avoided or caused said commitment not to issue at its proper time.” In Ex parte Esquivel, 531 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), we were confronted with an analogous situation. | 1 | 1979–1979 |