convicting court rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

convicting court rule in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Ex Parte Deeringergreen
texcrimapp · 2006 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2018
2 sentences

2018If a party moves for a nunc pro tunc order seeking jail-time credits and the convicting court fails to rule on or inappropriately denies the motion, “the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.” Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617–18 (Tex. Crim.

2012ANN. art. 42.03, § 2(a)(1). 4 appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.” Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617–18 (Tex. Crim.

25
In Re Daisygreen
texapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See Ex parte Ybarra, 149 5.W.3d at 149; Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616 , 617-18 & n. 7 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (“[B]efore we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc, and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.”); see also In re Daisy, 156 S.W.3d at 924 (“Further, if a motion for a nunc pro tunc order for back time c

2009App. 2006) ("[B]efore we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc , and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule."); see also In re Daisy , 156 S.W.3d at 924 ("Further, if a motion for a nunc pro tunc order for back time credit is filed and the trial judge fails to respond, relief may be sought by petition for writ of m

22
In Re Blakeneygreen
texapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See, e.g., In re Johnson, 07-10-0254-CV, 2011 Tex. App. Lexis 4886, at *4-5 (Tex.App.--Amarillo June 28, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Duffy, No. 07-09-0090-CV, 2009 Tex. App. Lexis 2738, at *4-5 (Tex.App.-- Amarillo Apr. 20, 2009, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); accord In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d at 661 ; In re Castle Tex. Prod.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Ex Parte Ybarra green
texcrimapp · 2004
1 sentence

2010Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d at 149 . ―Before we will entertain a claim of the denial of pre-sentence jail time credit, an applicant must first attempt to correct the 8 omission in the judgment by way of a motion nunc pro tunc, and that if the convicting court should decline to rule on the motion, the applicant must seek a writ of mandamus to the appropriate court of appeals to compel the convicting court to rule.’‖ Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616, 617-18 (Tex. Crim.

12010–2010
Ex Parte Esquivel green
texcrimapp · 1976
1 sentence

1979The court also found “That Defendant has not in any manner avoided or caused said commitment not to issue at its proper time.” In Ex parte Esquivel, 531 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), we were confronted with an analogous situation.

11979–1979

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check