Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allstate Texas Lloyds v. Masongreen2 sentences2008Allstate Tex. *731 Lloyds v. Mason, 123 S.W.3d 690, 698 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.). 2008See Mason, 123 S.W.3d at 698 . | 3 | 3 |
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Havnergreen2 sentences2011Id. at 595 . “[I]f there are other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated, the plaintiff must offer evidence excluding those causes with reasonable certainty.” Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. v. Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 720 (Tex.1997). 2011Id. at 595 . “[I]f there are other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated, the plaintiff must offer evidence excluding those causes with reasonable certainty.” Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. v. Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 720 (Tex. 1997). | 2 | 2 |
Martinez v. City of San Antoniogreen2 sentences2018See id.; Hess v. McLean Feedyard, Inc., 59 S.W.3d 679, 687 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000, pet. denied); Martinez v. City of San Antonio, 40 S.W.3d 587, 595 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, pet. denied). -4- 04-16-00712-CV Attached to the Batreses’ response to ACHD’s no evidence motion were an affidavit and deposition testimony from Daniel R. 2011Id. at 595 . “[I]f there are other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated, the plaintiff must offer evidence excluding those causes with reasonable certainty.” Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. v. Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 720 (Tex.1997). | 1 | 3 |
Hess v. McLean Feedyard, Inc.green1 sentence2018See id.; Hess v. McLean Feedyard, Inc., 59 S.W.3d 679, 687 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000, pet. denied); Martinez v. City of San Antonio, 40 S.W.3d 587, 595 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, pet. denied). -4- 04-16-00712-CV Attached to the Batreses’ response to ACHD’s no evidence motion were an affidavit and deposition testimony from Daniel R. | 1 | 1 |
Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres Ranchgreen1 sentence2015Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres Ranch, No. 13-0084, 2014 WL 4116810, at 15 (Tex. Aug. 22, 2014) (″The law requires experts to substantiate their opinions, and for good reasons… . | 1 | 1 |
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASS'N v. Pigottgreen1 sentence2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 1 |
State Farm Lloyds v. Hamiltongreen1 sentence2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 1 |
Keo v. Vugreen1 sentence2008Keo v. Vu, 76 S.W.3d 725, 734 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. denied). Á trial court properly excludes expert testimony as unreliable if: (1) the foundational data underlying the opinion is unreliable; (2) the methodology used by the expert to interpret the underlying data is flawed; (3) notwithstanding the validity of the underlying data and methodology, there is an analytical gap in the expert evidence; or (4) the expert fails to rule out other plausible causes. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State Farm Lloyds v. Mireles
green
1 sentence2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.