Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1990–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Herndongreen2 sentences2009See id. 2009See id. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Ad Valorem Tax Litigationgreen1 sentence2015Under the multidistrict litigation allegations in the Fourth Amended rules, “related” cases may be transferred from different Petition did not vest jurisdiction in trial courts to a single pretrial judge “if transfer will (1) the Multi–District Litigation court.” ... serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and (2) The flaw in that analysis is that there promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.” is nothing in Texas law that creates or See In re Ad Valorem Tax Litig., 216 S.W.3d 83, 84 (Tex. restricts subject matter jurisdiction of M.D.L. | 1 | 1 |
City of Abilene v. Woodlockgreen1 sentence2011The affidavit does not allege any fact that raises an issue of “a serious flaw or error in the assessment of punishment that adversely affected his substantial right to a fair trial by causing a disproportionate punishment to be assessed.” See Stewart , 282 S.W.2d at 736. | 1 | 1 |
Minyard Food Stores, Inc. v. Goodmangreen1 sentence2002See 50 S.W.3d at 143 . | 1 | 1 |
Tempo Tamers, Inc. v. Crow-Houston Four, Ltd.green1 sentence1993See Tempo Tamers, 715 S.W.2d at 669 . | 1 | 1 |
Howell v. Stategreen1 sentence1990More than sixty years, that is insanity." Howell v. State, 757 S.W.2d 513, at 518 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st] 1988) PDR refused; see also cases discussed in Part II B 3, ante. [16] We observe the flaw in that analysis is that § 4(a) provides, "If the defendant is sentenced to a term of less than six years, he must serve at least two years before he is eligible for parole." Good conduct time is not available when there is an affirmative finding of deadly weapon. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lo, Ex Parte John Christopher
green
1 sentence2022As the Court of Criminal Appeals determined, Lester’s conviction under subsection (f) was to an offense 4Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Stewart
green
1 sentence2011The court of appeals agreed that the record did not show an Eighth Amendment violation, but concluded that, in this situation, appellant was moving for a new trial “in the interest of justice” and had the burden of proving “a serious flaw or error in the assessment of punishment that adversely affected his substantial right to a fair trial by causing a disproportionate punishment to be assessed.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.