Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Theus v. Stategreen2 sentences2023The fourth and fifth Theus factors “both depend on the nature of a defendant’s defense and the means available to him of proving that defense.” Id. 2015The fourth and fifth Theus factors are related “because both depend on the nature of a defendant’s defense and the means available to him of proving that defense.” Id. | 3 | 6 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Theus, 845 S.W.2d at 881 ; Davis, 259 S.W.3d at 784 . 2013See Davis v. State, 259 S.W.3d 778, 784 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 2 |
Woodall v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See id. at 397. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.