Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tri-M Erectors, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.green2 sentences2002See Clearwater Constructors, 788 S.W.2d at 908 . 2002See Clearwater Constructors, 788 S.W.2d at 908 . | 4 | 4 |
Alexander v. Hagedorngreen2 sentences1969See Alexander v. Hagedorn, 148 Tex. 565 , 226 S.W.2d 996 (1950). 1969See Alexander v. Hagedorn, 148 Tex. 565 , 226 S.W.2d 996 (1950). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hanks v. Rosser
green
2 sentences1995The first case to add a twist to the Hagedorn rule was Hanks v. Rosser, 378 S.W.2d 31 (Tex.1964). 1969In Hanks v. Rosser, 378 S.W.2d 31 (Tex.Sup.1964), we somewhat relaxed the harshness of the Hagedorn rule. | 2 | 1969–1995 |
McEwen v. Harrison
green
2 sentences1986Dicta in McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125 , 345 S.W.2d 706 (1961) support this proposition. 1986Dicta in McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125 , 345 S.W.2d 706 (1961) support this proposition. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. Carroll
green
2 sentences1979Further, in Petro-Chemical the court stated that the Hagedorn rule was “entirely sound as applied to a defendant who suffered a default judgment after proper personal service of citation, but it does not govern the disposition of all bill of review cases.” 514 S.W.2d at 244 . 1979Further, in Petro-Chemical the court stated that the Hagedorn rule was “entirely sound as applied to a defendant who suffered a default judgment after proper personal service of citation, but it does not govern the disposition of all bill of review cases.” 514 S.W.2d at 244 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |