hair follicle drug analysis (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

hair follicle drug analysis in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
In the Interest of E.R.W.green
texapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Further, the caseworker testified that appellant refused to submit to a hair follicle drug test. “[A] fact finder reasonably can infer that a parent’s failure to submit to court- ordered drug tests indicates the parent is avoiding testing because they were using illegal drugs.” In re E.R.W., 528 S.W.3d 251, 265 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.).

11
In Re TRSgreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023App. 2006); In re T.R.S., 115 S.W.3d 318, 320 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2003, no pet.)).

11
Rickels v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023As noted above, the motion to revoke and amended motion to revoke alleged Wooden used methamphetamine. 8 Wooden testified that he offered to take a hair-follicle drug test, but Davis did not recall that offer, and there is no indication one was ever performed. 4 (citing Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763 (Tex. Crim.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
In Re DSA green
texapp · 2003
2 sentences

2011The father testified at trial that the Department "did a home evaluation on [the paternal grandfather] and [the Department] said he was an unfit parent because of his past criminal record." The mother attempts to avoid the application of our holding in D.S.A., 113 S.W.3d at 573 , in which we recognized that an incarcerated parent may provide a safe environment for a child through family members.

2011The father testified at trial that the Department “did a home evaluation on [the paternal grandfather] and [the Department] said he was an unfit parent because of his past criminal record.” The mother attempts to avoid the application of our holding in D.S.A., 113 S.W.3d at 573 , in which we recognized that an incarcerated parent may provide a safe environment for a child through family members.

52010–2011
in the Interest of M.R.J.M., a Child green
texapp · 2009
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001 (7) TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 263.307 (6) TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 153.191 (5) TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 161.004 (5) TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 161.101 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 8 (2010–2024) CO 2 (2016–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check