Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
O'CANAS v. Stategreen1 sentence2024This Court has considered this instruction as well and has held that it does not violate Paulson because it does not define “reasonable doubt.” See, e.g., Bullock v. State, 673 S.W.3d 758 , 767–68 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2023, no pet.); Thomas v. State, No. 05-19-00347-CR, 2020 WL 2988639 , at *7 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 4, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication); McDaniel v. State, No. 05-15-01086-CR, 2016 WL 7473902 , at *6–7 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 29, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication); O’Canas v. State, 140 S.W.3d 695, 702 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, pet. | 1 | 1 |
Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-Appelleegreen2 sentences2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. 2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Cabinetree of Wisconsin, Incorporated v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Incorporatedgreen1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Lomas v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.green2 sentences2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. 2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
In The Matter Of The Complaint Of Sedco, Inc.green1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Brendan Gilmore v. Shearson/american Express Inc.green1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
cluster 596121green2 sentences2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. 2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Patrick D. Kelly v. Marc Goldengreen1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. v. Skanska Usa Buildinggreen2 sentences2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. 2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 1 |
Gorman v. Gormangreen2 sentences2012Olibas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gorman v. Gorman, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 91) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. 2012Oli-bas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex. App.-El Paso Aug. 23, 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gomian v. Gomian, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 92) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. | 1 | 1 |
JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc.green2 sentences2012Olibas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gorman v. Gorman, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 91) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. 2012Oli-bas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex. App.-El Paso Aug. 23, 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gomian v. Gomian, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 92) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. | 1 | 1 |
Olibas v. Gomezgreen2 sentences2012Olibas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gorman v. Gorman, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 91) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. 2012Oli-bas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex. App.-El Paso Aug. 23, 2007, pet. denied) (citing JHC Ventures, L.P. v. Fast Trucking, Inc., 94 S.W.3d 762, 778 (Tex.App.San Antonio 2002, no pet.) and Gomian v. Gomian, 966 S.W.2d 858, 868-69 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)). 92) In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Williamsgreen1 sentence1997See Williams v. Williams, 720 S.W.2d 246, 249 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Low v. Henry
green
2 sentences2014Paragraph 91 of the Texas Children’s Hospital order concluded: In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n. 5. 2014Paragraph 91 of the Texas Children’s Hospital order concluded: In determining the amount of sanctions, this Court has considered the factors listed in Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 620 & n.5. | 3 | 2012–2014 |
Perry Homes v. Cull
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 591-92 . 2009Id. at 591-92 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Com-Tech Associates v. Computer Associates International, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Int’l, Inc., 938 F.2d 1574 , 1577 (2d Cir. 1991); E.C. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Andrew S. Grumhaus and Leslie Grumhaus-Davidson v. Comerica Securities, Inc., as Successor-In-Interest to Comerica Financial Services Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Republic Insurance v. Paico Receivables, LLC
green
2 sentences2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. 2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Brown v. Dillard's, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Like the federal courts, this Court has considered factors such as: 59 . when the movant knew of the arbitration clause; 48 Grumhaus, 223 F.3d at 650 ; [**22] see also Cabinetree of Wis., Inc. v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc., 50 F.3d 388, 391 (7th Cir. 1995). 49 PAICO, 383 F.3d at 346 ; In re Citigroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 23 , 26 (1st Cir. 2004); Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994); Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., 980 F.2d 912, 926 (3d Cir. 1992). 50 Brown v. Dillard’s, Inc., 430 F.3d 1004 , 1012 (9th Cir. 2005); Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.