Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCain v. NME Hospitals, Inc.green2 sentences2008See Mecom, 28 S.W.3d at 136 ; McCain v. NME Hosps., Inc., 856 S.W.2d 751, 757 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1993, no writ). 2008See Mecom, 28 S.W.3d at 136 ; McCain v. NME Hosps., Inc., 856 S.W.2d 751, 757 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1993, no writ). | 3 | 3 |
Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. v. Mecomgreen2 sentences2008See Mecom, 28 S.W.3d at 136 ; McCain v. NME Hosps., Inc., 856 S.W.2d 751, 757 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1993, no writ). 2008See Mecom, 28 S.W.3d at 136 ; McCain v. NME Hosps., Inc., 856 S.W.2d 751, 757 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1993, no writ). | 3 | 3 |
Leigh Gomer v. Altha/Ann Steinlage, Donald Davis and Ruby Davisgreen2 sentences2021See Gomer, 419 S.W.3d at 478 ; Robson, 267 S.W.3d at 407 . 2015See Gomer, 419 S.W.3d at 478 ; Robson, 267 S.W.3d at 407 . | 2 | 2 |
Hailey v. Haileygreen1 sentence2012See Hailey v. Hailey, 176 S.W.3d 374, 383 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) ("When the trial court’s findings of fact address a ground of recovery or defense, but inadvertently omit an essential element, we may infer the omitted element...."). 7 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re MPBgreen1 sentence2009See Worford v. Stamper , 801 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. 1990); In re M.P.B. , 257 S.W.3d 804, 809 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.) (applying the implied finding rule to an appeal of a child custody modification proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
Worford v. Stampergreen1 sentence2009See Worford v. Stamper , 801 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. 1990); In re M.P.B. , 257 S.W.3d 804, 809 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.) (applying the implied finding rule to an appeal of a child custody modification proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robson v. Gilbreath
green
2 sentences2021See Gomer, 419 S.W.3d at 478 ; Robson, 267 S.W.3d at 407 . 2015See Gomer, 419 S.W.3d at 478 ; Robson, 267 S.W.3d at 407 . | 2 | 2015–2021 |
State v. Ross
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.