motion to continue hearing (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

motion to continue hearing in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re DEPgreen
texapp · 1974 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See In re D.E.P. , 512 S.W.2d at 791 ; see also In re J.M. , 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9708 , at *7; In re T.E. , 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5266 , at *5; In re B.N. , 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 6331 , at *2.

2008See In re D.E.P., 512 S.W.2d at 791 ; see also In re J.M., 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9708 , at *7; In re T.E., 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5266 , at *5; In re B.N., 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 6331 , at *2. any binding authority addressing this contention, we decline to find that section 53.04 of the fam ily code applies to petitions to m odify a prior disposition. 3 Condition twenty-two of the trial court’s probation order provided that appellant “shall abide by the rules and regulations of Gulf Coast Trade[s] Center.” The record contains: (1) a report from the Hidalgo County Juvenile Probation Departm ent and

22
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.red
tex · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
John H. Thomas, M.D. v. Graham Mortgage Corporation and Chris Norris, Substitute Trustee green
texapp · 2013
2 sentences

2014Id. at 587 .

2014Id. at 587 .

22014–2014
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda green
tex · 2004
1 sentence

2025Id. at 227 ; Maspero, 640 S.W.3d at 529; City of San Antonio v. Riojas, 640 S.W.3d 534 , 536 n.8 (Tex. 1 Rodriguez also filed a motion to continue the hearing on the City’s plea to the jurisdiction.

12025–2025
Dawson-Austin v. Austin green
tex · 1998
2 sentences

2023While it is correct that obtaining a ruling on some issues, such as a motion to continue the hearing on the special appearance, will not waive the special appearance, see Dawson-Austin, 968 S.W.2d at 323 , a party must not “request affirmative relief inconsistent with . . . the assertion that the district court lacked jurisdiction.” Id.

2023While it is correct that obtaining a ruling on some issues, such as a motion to continue the hearing on the special appearance, will not waive the special appearance, see Dawson-Austin, 968 S.W.2d at 323 , a party must not “request affirmative relief inconsistent with . . . the assertion that the district court lacked jurisdiction.” Id.

12023–2023
in Re Steven and Shyla Lipsky and Alisa Rich green
texapp · 2013
1 sentence

2016Id. (wherein the trial court granted a motion to continue the hearing and ultimately heard the motion over four months after it was filed).

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

OH 16 (1954–2022) TX 8 (2008–2025) LA 6 (1993–2022) CA 5 (1961–2026) NC 3 (2004–2008) WA 3 (2013–2019) AL 3 (2006–2011) IL 3 (1981–2026) GA 3 (1920–1995) ID 2 (2014–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check