Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc.green2 sentences2022See Martin, 989 S.W.2d at 359 . 2021See Martin, 989 S.W.2d at 359 . | 2 | 2 |
McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc.green2 sentences2012See id. 2012See id. | 2 | 2 |
Aetna Casualty & Surety v. Wildgreen2 sentences2003See Stewart Title , 822 S.W.2d at 12 ; Aetna Cas . & Sur . v. Wild , 944 S.W.2d 37, 41 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, writ denied). 2003See Stewart Title, 822 S.W.2d at 12 ; Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. *48 Wild, 944 S.W.2d 37, 41 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Sterlinggreen2 sentences2003See Stewart Title , 822 S.W.2d at 12 ; Aetna Cas . & Sur . v. Wild , 944 S.W.2d 37, 41 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, writ denied). 2003See Stewart Title, 822 S.W.2d at 12 ; Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. *48 Wild, 944 S.W.2d 37, 41 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc.green1 sentence2003Tex., Inc. , 937 S.W.2d 60, 69 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997), aff’d as modified , 975 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1998). [27] But see Rowe v. Rowe , 887 S.W.2d 191, 199 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, writ denied) (almost identical question held to be proper under Texas law when challenged for improper measure of damages). [28] Donnelly objected that in answering Question 4, the jury was not limited to assessing attorney’s fees incurred solely by Mike Willis for only the promissory note claim. | 1 | 1 |
Rowe v. Rowegreen1 sentence2003Tex., Inc. , 937 S.W.2d 60, 69 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997), aff’d as modified , 975 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1998). [27] But see Rowe v. Rowe , 887 S.W.2d 191, 199 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, writ denied) (almost identical question held to be proper under Texas law when challenged for improper measure of damages). [28] Donnelly objected that in answering Question 4, the jury was not limited to assessing attorney’s fees incurred solely by Mike Willis for only the promissory note claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003Tex., Inc. , 937 S.W.2d 60, 69 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997), aff’d as modified , 975 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1998). [27] But see Rowe v. Rowe , 887 S.W.2d 191, 199 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, writ denied) (almost identical question held to be proper under Texas law when challenged for improper measure of damages). [28] Donnelly objected that in answering Question 4, the jury was not limited to assessing attorney’s fees incurred solely by Mike Willis for only the promissory note claim. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Richards v. Allen
green
1 sentence1971State v. Easley, 404 S.W.2d 296 (Tex.1966) ; Richards v. Allen, 402 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.1966). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
State v. Easley
green
1 sentence1971State v. Easley, 404 S.W.2d 296 (Tex.1966) ; Richards v. Allen, 402 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.1966). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.