release or transfer hearing in Texas

2000He states in his brief that the release or transfer hearing is analogous to the punishment phase of a criminal trial, and that in reviewing an ineffective assistance claim at punishment, the appellate court is required to examine the totality of the representation received to determine whether it was “counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance,” citing Ex parte Williams, 753 S.W.2d 695, 698 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).

2000He states in his brief that the release or transfer hearing is analogous to the punishment phase of a criminal trial, and that in reviewing an ineffective assistance claim at punishment, the appellate court is required to examine the totality of the representation received to determine whether it was "counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance," citing Ex parte Williams, 753 S.W.2d 695, 698 (Tex.Crim.

1996See C.D.R. v. State, 827 S.W.2d 589, 592 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ).

1996See C.D.R. v. State, 827 S.W.2d 589, 592 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ).

2021To preserve error for appellate review, (1) the complaining party must make a timely objection specifying the grounds for the objection, if the grounds are not apparent from the context; (2) “[t]he objection must be made at the earliest possible opportunity”; and (3) “[t]he complaining party must obtain an adverse ruling from the trial court.” Dixon v. State, 2 S.W.3d 263, 265 (Tex. Crim.

2006Matter of D.S., 921 S.W.2d 383, 388 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1996, writ dism’d w.o.j.) During this hearing, the trial court may consider “ written reports from probation officers, professional court employees, professional consultants, or employees of the Texas Youth Commission, in addition to the testimony of witnesses.” Tex. Fam.