Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tcherepnin v. Knight
green
2 sentences2008Tcherepnin v. Knight, 389 U.S. 332, 338 , 88 S.Ct. 548, 554 , 19 L.Ed.2d 564 (1967). 2008Tcherepnin v. Knight, 389 U.S. 332, 338 , 88 S.Ct. 548, 554 , 19 L.Ed.2d 564 (1967). | 6 | 2008–2008 |
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mutual Benefits Corp.
green
1 sentence2013In discussing the Howey test pronounced by the Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit noted “this approach ‘embodies a flexible rather than a static principle, one that is capable of adaptation to meet the countless and variable schemes devised by those who seek the use of money of others on the promises of profits.’ ” Id. (citing Howey, 328 U.S. at 299 , 66 S.Ct. 1100 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.
green
2 sentences2013In discussing the Howey test pronounced by the Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit noted “this approach ‘embodies a flexible rather than a static principle, one that is capable of adaptation to meet the countless and variable schemes devised by those who seek the use of money of others on the promises of profits.’ ” Id. (citing Howey, 328 U.S. at 299 , 66 S.Ct. 1100 ). 2013In discussing the Howey test pronounced by the Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit noted “this approach ‘embodies a flexible rather than a static principle, one that is capable of adaptation to meet the countless and variable schemes devised by those who seek the use of money of others on the promises of profits.’ ” Id. (citing Howey, 328 U.S. at 299 , 66 S.Ct. 1100 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Florida Discount Centers, Inc. v. Antinori
green
1 sentence1970It urges that the cases cited in Howey do not support the proposition and calls attention to other language in Howey indicating the test “embodies a flexible rather than a static principle * * The State cites Florida Discount Centers, Inc. v. Antinori, 226 So.2d 693 , District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2nd District, which was affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court in 232 So.2d 17 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Florida Discount Centers, Inc. v. Antinori
green
1 sentence1970It urges that the cases cited in Howey do not support the proposition and calls attention to other language in Howey indicating the test “embodies a flexible rather than a static principle * * The State cites Florida Discount Centers, Inc. v. Antinori, 226 So.2d 693 , District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2nd District, which was affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court in 232 So.2d 17 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.