Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nuernberg v. Texas Employment Commissiongreen2 sentences1995Nuernberg, 858 S.W.2d at 365 ; Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 . 1995Nuernberg, 858 S.W.2d at 365 ; Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 . | 1 | 2 |
Vargas v. Stategreen1 sentence1996Cf. Vargas v. State, 883 S.W.2d 256, 259 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1994, pet. refd) (motion that named no judge but sought to recuse “visiting judge” was insufficient to trigger mandatory referral of recusal motion). | 1 | 1 |
Texas Employment Commission v. City of Houstongreen1 sentence1996Arrellano v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 810 S.W.2d 767, 770 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1991, writ denied); Texas Employment Comm’n v. City of Houston, 616 S.W.2d 255, 258 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1981), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 618 S.W.2d 329 (Tex.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Arrellano v. Texas Employment Commissiongreen1 sentence1996Arrellano v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 810 S.W.2d 767, 770 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1991, writ denied); Texas Employment Comm’n v. City of Houston, 616 S.W.2d 255, 258 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1981), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 618 S.W.2d 329 (Tex.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Haas v. Texas Employment Commissiongreen2 sentences1994Nuernberg v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 858 S.W.2d 364, 365 (1993); Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 ; Haas v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 683 S.W.2d 462, 464 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1984, no writ). 1994Nuernberg v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 858 S.W.2d 364, 365 (1993); Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 ; Haas v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 683 S.W.2d 462, 464 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1984, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mercer v. Ross
green
2 sentences1995Nuernberg, 858 S.W.2d at 365 ; Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 . 1995Nuernberg, 858 S.W.2d at 365 ; Mercer, 701 S.W.2d at 831 . | 2 | 1994–1995 |
City of Houston v. Texas Employment Commission
neutral
1 sentence1996Arrellano v. Texas Employment Comm’n, 810 S.W.2d 767, 770 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1991, writ denied); Texas Employment Comm’n v. City of Houston, 616 S.W.2d 255, 258 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1981), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 618 S.W.2d 329 (Tex.1981). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Texas Employment Commission v. Alvarez
green
2 sentences1996Alvarez, 915 S.W.2d at 163 . 1996Alvarez, 915 S.W.2d at 164 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Texas Emp. Com'n v. INTERNATIONAL U. OF E., R. & M. WKRS.
green
1 sentence1994TEC’s plea to the jurisdiction relied on a 1961 decision by the Texas Supreme Court, Texas Employment Commission v. Internartional Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers, Local Union No. 782, 163 Tex. 135 , 352 S.W.2d 252 (1961) (hereafter “TEC v. IUE”). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Texas Employment Commission & General Electric Co. v. International Union of Electric Radio & Machine Workers, Local Union no. 782
green
1 sentence1994TEC’s plea to the jurisdiction relied on a 1961 decision by the Texas Supreme Court, Texas Employment Commission v. Internartional Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers, Local Union No. 782, 163 Tex. 135 , 352 S.W.2d 252 (1961) (hereafter “TEC v. IUE”). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Alfred Nuernberg v. Texas Employment Commission
green
1 sentence1993The court of appeals affirmed. 846 S.W.2d 41 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Instant Photo, Inc. v. Texas Employment Commission
green
2 sentences1991In the case of Instant Photo, Inc. v. Texas Employment Commission, 650 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1983, no writ), the trial court conducted its review on a purely substantial evidence basis, i.e., it simply reviewed the transcript of the administrative hearing which had been introduced into evidence. 1991In the case of Instant Photo, Inc. v. Texas Employment Commission, 650 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.App—San Antonio 1983, no writ), the trial court conducted its review on a purely substantial evidence basis, i.e., it simply reviewed the transcript of the administrative hearing which had been introduced into evidence. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor
neutral
2 sentences1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref’d n.r.e.); 2 Tex.JuR.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). 1 In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was other 1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref'd n.r.e.); 2 Tex.Jur.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). [1] In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was oth | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission
green
2 sentences1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref’d n.r.e.); 2 Tex.JuR.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). 1 In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was other 1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref'd n.r.e.); 2 Tex.Jur.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). [1] In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was oth | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Kavanagh v. Holcombe
green
2 sentences1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref’d n.r.e.); 2 Tex.JuR.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). 1 In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was other 1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref'd n.r.e.); 2 Tex.Jur.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). [1] In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was oth | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Miller v. Tarry
green
2 sentences1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref’d n.r.e.); 2 Tex.JuR.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). 1 In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was other 1991App.—Austin 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Texas Liquor Control Board v. Taylor, 338 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1960, no writ); Kavanagh v. Holcombe, 312 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1958, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Miller v. Tarry, 191 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1945, writ ref'd n.r.e.); 2 Tex.Jur.3d Administrative Law § 84 (1979). [1] In the recent case of Beaumont v. Texas Employment Commission, 753 S.W.2d 770 , the court held that the admission of a letter contained in the record of the administrative proceeding before the TEC was error, but that it was harmless error because there was oth | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.