Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garciagreen2 sentences2012In its brief, TPWD contends that “the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff must decide to sue either the governmental unit or the employee, but not both, and that the irrevocable decision must be made before suit is filed.” Mission Consol., 253 S.W.3d 653, 656 (emphasis in TPWD brief). 2011In its brief, TPWD contends that “the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff must decide to sue either the governmental unit or the employee, but not both, and that the irrevocable decision must be made before suit is filed.” Mission Consol., 253 S.W.3d 653, 656 (emphasis in TPWD brief). | 2 | 2 |
Harris County v. Sykesgreen2 sentences2010See Sykes, 136 S.W.3d at 639 (requiring dismissal with prejudice where plaintiff previously had opportunity to amend); 2 Because we have sustained TPWD’s challenge to Garland’s pleadings, we do not reach TPWD’s arguments related to the existence of jurisdictional facts. 2010See Sykes, 136 S.W.3d at 639 (requiring dismissal with prejudice where plaintiff previously had opportunity to amend); 2 Because we have sustained TPWD’s challenge to Garland’s pleadings, we do not reach TPWD’s arguments related to the existence of jurisdictional facts. | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Mirandagreen1 sentence2015The Court is to “take as true all evidence favorable to the nonmovant, indulging every reasonable inference and resolving any doubts in the nonmovant’s favor.” Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 228 (Tex.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Holder v. Mellon Mortgage Co.green1 sentence1998See Holder, 954 S.W.2d at 808 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. E.E. Lowrey Realty, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 694 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu
green
1 sentence2007Similarly, mere *695 ly pleading more facts in support of Low-rey’s breach of contract claim will not overcome TPWD’s immunity from suit. 2 See Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d at 840 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |